These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18329424)

  • 21. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Eye fixation scanpaths of younger and older drivers in a hazard perception task.
    Underwood G; Phelps N; Wright C; van Loon E; Galpin A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):346-56. PubMed ID: 15953120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Driver's exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment.
    Stutts J; Feaganes J; Reinfurt D; Rodgman E; Hamlett C; Gish K; Staplin L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Nov; 37(6):1093-101. PubMed ID: 16011827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task.
    Ma R; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1351-64. PubMed ID: 17558674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of auditory and visual distracters on the useful field of view: implications for the driving task.
    Wood J; Chaparro A; Hickson L; Thyer N; Carter P; Hancock J; Hoe A; Le I; Sahetapy L; Ybarzabal F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4646-50. PubMed ID: 17003463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance.
    Beede KE; Kass SJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 16310750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unsafe rear-end collision avoidance in Alzheimer's disease.
    Uc EY; Rizzo M; Anderson SW; Shi Q; Dawson JD
    J Neurol Sci; 2006 Dec; 251(1-2):35-43. PubMed ID: 17049360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving.
    Wittmann M; Kiss M; Gugg P; Steffen A; Fink M; Pöppel E; Kamiya H
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Mar; 37(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 16118009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vigilance monitoring for operator safety: A simulation study on highway driving.
    Desai AV; Haque MA
    J Safety Res; 2006; 37(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 16626742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality.
    Horrey WJ; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):611-24. PubMed ID: 15709324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance.
    Matthews G; Desmond PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):659-86. PubMed ID: 12047065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Examining cognitive interference and adaptive safety behaviours in tactical vehicle control.
    Horrey WJ; Simons DJ
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1340-50. PubMed ID: 17558673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of experience and short-term practice on drivers' eye movements and errors in simulated dangerous situations.
    Allen JA; Schroeder SR; Ball PG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 1):767-76. PubMed ID: 740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of perceptual speed regulation on speed perception, choice, and control: tunnel wall characteristics and influences.
    Manser MP; Hancock PA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jan; 39(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 16959197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual and attentional effects on drivers' speed selection at curves.
    Charlton SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 Sep; 36(5):877-84. PubMed ID: 15203365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tau as a potential control variable for visually guided braking.
    Rock PB; Harris MG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):251-67. PubMed ID: 16634669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vehicle automation: a remedy for driver stress?
    Funke G; Matthews G; Warm JS; Emo AK
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1302-23. PubMed ID: 17558671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adaptive strategy changes as a function of task demands: a study of car drivers.
    Cnossen F; Meijman T; Rothengatter T
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(2):218-36. PubMed ID: 14660214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distraction from multiple in-vehicle secondary tasks: vehicle performance and mental workload implications.
    Lansdown TC; Brook-Carter N; Kersloot T
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jan; 47(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 14660220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance.
    Myers RS; Ball KK; Kalina TD; Roth DL; Goode KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):279-90. PubMed ID: 11011899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.