BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18329547)

  • 1. Lateralisation of intranasal trigeminal chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Rombaux P; Guérit JM; Mouraux A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2008 Feb; 38(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18329547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration.
    Stuck BA; Frey S; Freiburg C; Hörmann K; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1367-75. PubMed ID: 16651024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chemosensory event-related potentials during sleep--a pilot study.
    Stuck BA; Weitz H; Hörmann K; Maurer JT; Hummel T
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 16934401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Rombaux P; Mouraux A; Bertrand B; Guerit JM; Hummel T
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2006; 36(2):53-62. PubMed ID: 16844543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemosensory event-related brain potentials (CSERP) after strictly monorhinal stimulation.
    Gudziol H; Fischer J; Bitter T; Guntinas-Lichius O
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Sep; 93(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 24952214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation.
    Frasnelli J; Heilmann S; Hummel T
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 May; 362(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 15147782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal-to-noise ratio of chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Boesveldt S; Haehner A; Berendse HW; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):690-5. PubMed ID: 17188566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whole-head MEG analysis of cortical spatial organization from unilateral stimulation of median nerve in both hands: no complete hemispheric homology.
    Theuvenet PJ; van Dijk BW; Peters MJ; van Ree JM; Lopes da Silva FL; Chen AC
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 16040256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Topographical differences in the trigeminal sensitivity of the human nasal mucosa.
    Scheibe M; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Neuroreport; 2006 Sep; 17(13):1417-20. PubMed ID: 16932150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cerebral activation to intranasal chemosensory trigeminal stimulation.
    Boyle JA; Heinke M; Gerber J; Frasnelli J; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2007 May; 32(4):343-53. PubMed ID: 17308328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemosensory event-related potentials to trigeminal stimuli change in relation to the interval between repetitive stimulation of the nasal mucosa.
    Hummel T; Kobal G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 10065380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intranasal trigeminal function in subjects with and without an intact sense of smell.
    Iannilli E; Gerber J; Frasnelli J; Hummel T
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1139():235-44. PubMed ID: 17274965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemosensory event-related potentials in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Hummel T; Pauli E; Schüler P; Kettenmann B; Stefan H; Kobal G
    Epilepsia; 1995 Jan; 36(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 8001515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responses to olfactory and intranasal trigeminal stimuli: relation to the respiratory cycle.
    Haehner A; Gruenewald G; Dibenedetto M; Hummel T
    Neuroscience; 2011 Feb; 175():178-83. PubMed ID: 21145944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of short inter-stimulus intervals on olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials.
    Kassab A; Schaub F; Vent J; Hüttenbrink KB; Damm M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1250-6. PubMed ID: 19863320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Olfactory and chemosomatosensory function in pregnant women assessed with event-related potentials.
    Olofsson JK; Broman DA; Wulff M; Martinkauppi M; Nordin S
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Sep; 86(1-2):252-7. PubMed ID: 16112693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intranasal chemoreception in patients with multiple chemical sensitivities: a double-blind investigation.
    Hummel T; Roscher S; Jaumann MP; Kobal G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Aug; 24(1 Pt 2):S79-86. PubMed ID: 8921561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trigeminal somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to tactile stimulation.
    Nevalainen P; Ramstad R; Isotalo E; Haapanen ML; Lauronen L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 117(9):2007-15. PubMed ID: 16859989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laterality of the olfactory event-related potential response.
    Olofsson JK; Broman DA; Gilbert PE; Dean P; Nordin S; Murphy C
    Chem Senses; 2006 Sep; 31(7):699-704. PubMed ID: 16849435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical sympathetic block prolongs the latency and reduces the amplitude of trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials on the contralateral side.
    Kawaguchi J; Matsuura N; Kasahara M; Ichinohe T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Feb; 32(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 25159735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.