These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Impact of Physiologic Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing Among Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Greater Than 35%: A Systematic Review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Slotwiner DJ; Raitt MH; Del-Carpio Munoz F; Mulpuru SK; Nasser N; Peterson PN Circulation; 2019 Aug; 140(8):e483-e503. PubMed ID: 30586773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A randomized double-blind comparison of biventricular versus left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Biventricular versus Left Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients (B-LEFT HF) trial. Boriani G; Kranig W; Donal E; Calo L; Casella M; Delarche N; Lozano IF; Ansalone G; Biffi M; Boulogne E; Leclercq C; Am Heart J; 2010 Jun; 159(6):1052-1058.e1. PubMed ID: 20569719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Electrical and mechanical components of dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with normal QRS duration and left bundle-branch block: impact of left and biventricular pacing. Turner MS; Bleasdale RA; Vinereanu D; Mumford CE; Paul V; Fraser AG; Frenneaux MP Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):2544-9. PubMed ID: 15148267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of physiologic pacing versus right ventricular pacing among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%: A systematic review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Slotwiner DJ; Raitt MH; Del-Carpio Munoz F; Mulpuru SK; Nasser N; Peterson PN Heart Rhythm; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e280-e298. PubMed ID: 30412776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: results from a multicentre international randomized trial (PREVENT-HF). Stockburger M; Gómez-Doblas JJ; Lamas G; Alzueta J; Fernández-Lozano I; Cobo E; Wiegand U; Concha JF; Navarro X; Navarro-López F; de Teresa E Eur J Heart Fail; 2011 Jun; 13(6):633-41. PubMed ID: 21613427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cardiac resynchronization as therapy for congestive cardiac failure in children dependent on chronic cardiac pacing. van Beek E; Backx A; Singh S Cardiol Young; 2006 Apr; 16(2):187-9. PubMed ID: 16553984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Cardiac resynchronization therapy in terminal heart failure: current status and prospects]. Sack S; Heinzel F; Dagres N; Wieneke H; Erbel R Herz; 2001 Feb; 26(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 11258115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Isovolumic relaxation flow detected by Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing right ventricular pacing. Hecht SR; Kirschner E; Berger M Am J Cardiol; 1995 Apr; 75(10):753-4. PubMed ID: 7900682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: rationale and design of the PREVENT-HF study. de Teresa E; Gómez-Doblas JJ; Lamas G; Alzueta J; Fernández-Lozano I; Cobo E; Navarro X; Navarro-López F; Stockburger M Europace; 2007 Jun; 9(6):442-6. PubMed ID: 17460018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Alternate site pacing in patients at risk for heart failure. Angiology; ; . PubMed ID: 18632765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]