132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18330820)
1. Myometrial thickness according to uterine site, gestational age and prior cesarean delivery.
Durnwald CP; Mercer BM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Apr; 21(4):247-50. PubMed ID: 18330820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasonographic evaluation of myometrial thickness in twin pregnancies.
Sfakianaki AK; Buhimschi IA; Pettker CM; Magloire LK; Turan OM; Hamar BD; Buhimschi CS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 198(5):530.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18279826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements of the lower uterine segment during gestation.
Ginsberg Y; Goldstein I; Lowenstein L; Weiner Z
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):214-7. PubMed ID: 23505018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Myometrial thickness during human labor and immediately post partum.
Buhimschi CS; Buhimschi IA; Malinow AM; Weiner CP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):553-9. PubMed ID: 12592271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted "on the scar" versus "in the niche".
Kaelin Agten A; Cali G; Monteagudo A; Oviedo J; Ramos J; Timor-Tritsch I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):510.e1-510.e6. PubMed ID: 28115056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonographic myometrial thickness predicts the latency interval of women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes and oligohydramnios.
Buhimschi CS; Buhimschi IA; Norwitz ER; Sfakianaki AK; Hamar B; Copel JA; Saade GR; Weiner CP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 1):762-70. PubMed ID: 16150272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural history of early first-trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars.
Zosmer N; Fuller J; Shaikh H; Johns J; Ross JA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 46(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 25586877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myometrial thickness in pregnancy: longitudinal sonographic study.
Degani S; Leibovitz Z; Shapiro I; Gonen R; Ohel G
J Ultrasound Med; 1998 Oct; 17(10):661-5. PubMed ID: 9771611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 2D versus 3D transabdominal sonography for the measurement of lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Cheung VY; Yang F; Leung KY
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 114(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 21724187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.
Brahmalakshmy BL; Kushtagi P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):755-62. PubMed ID: 25209351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery.
Cheung VY; Constantinescu OC; Ahluwalia BS
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Nov; 23(11):1441-7. PubMed ID: 15498908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of transverse fundal incision method of cesarean section for women with placentas widely covering the entire anterior uterine wall.
Nishida R; Yamada T; Akaishi R; Kojima T; Ishikawa S; Takeda M; Morikawa M; Yamada T; Minakami H
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 22690852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can myometrial thickness/cervical length ratio predict preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor? A prospective study.
Gürsoy Erzincan S; Sayin NC; Korkmaz S; Sutcu H; Inan C; Uzun Cilingir I; Varol FG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 May; 299(5):1275-1282. PubMed ID: 30874948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Kushtagi P; Garepalli S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 283(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 20145938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of myometrial thickness and the latency interval of women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes.
Atarjavdan L; Khazaeipour Z; Shahbazi F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1339-43. PubMed ID: 21298281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Final outcome of a second trimester low-positioned placenta: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jansen CHJR; Kleinrouweler CE; van Leeuwen L; Ruiter L; Limpens J; van Wely M; Mol BW; Pajkrt E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():197-204. PubMed ID: 31323500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
