BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18330868)

  • 1. Diffusion of surgical innovation among patients with kidney cancer.
    Miller DC; Saigal CS; Banerjee M; Hanley J; Litwin MS;
    Cancer; 2008 Apr; 112(8):1708-17. PubMed ID: 18330868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Provider-based research networks and diffusion of surgical technologies among patients with early-stage kidney cancer.
    Tan HJ; Meyer AM; Kuo TM; Smith AB; Wheeler SB; Carpenter WR; Nielsen ME
    Cancer; 2015 Mar; 121(6):836-43. PubMed ID: 25410684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgeon characteristics and long-term trends in the adoption of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Filson CP; Banerjee M; Wolf JS; Ye Z; Wei JT; Miller DC
    J Urol; 2011 Jun; 185(6):2072-7. PubMed ID: 21496845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital characteristics and use of innovative surgical therapies among patients with kidney cancer.
    Miller DC; Daignault S; Wolf JS; Hafez KS; Kieran K; Dunn RL; Hollenbeck BK
    Med Care; 2008 Apr; 46(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 18362816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term survival following partial vs radical nephrectomy among older patients with early-stage kidney cancer.
    Tan HJ; Norton EC; Ye Z; Hafez KS; Gore JL; Miller DC
    JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(15):1629-35. PubMed ID: 22511691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health status and use of partial nephrectomy in older adults with early-stage kidney cancer.
    Tan HJ; Daskivich TJ; Shirk JD; Filson CP; Litwin MS; Hu JC
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):153.e7-153.e14. PubMed ID: 27955941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population level assessment of hospital based outcomes following laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy during the adoption of minimally invasive surgery.
    Tan HJ; Wolf JS; Ye Z; Hafez KS; Miller DC
    J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1231-7. PubMed ID: 24211600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns.
    Kercher KW; Heniford BT; Matthews BD; Smith TI; Lincourt AE; Hayes DH; Eskind LB; Irby PB; Teigland CM
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Dec; 17(12):1889-95. PubMed ID: 14569452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trend of Surgical Treatment of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    Jabaji RB; Fischer H; Kern T; Chien GW
    Perm J; 2019; 23():18-108. PubMed ID: 30624203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in partial and radical nephrectomy: an analysis of case logs from certifying urologists.
    Poon SA; Silberstein JL; Chen LY; Ehdaie B; Kim PH; Russo P
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):464-9. PubMed ID: 23454156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Renal and cardiovascular morbidity after partial or radical nephrectomy.
    Miller DC; Schonlau M; Litwin MS; Lai J; Saigal CS;
    Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(3):511-20. PubMed ID: 18072263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rates of open versus laparoscopic and partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a population-based evaluation.
    Bianchi M; Becker A; Abdollah F; Trinh QD; Hansen J; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M
    Int J Urol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1064-71. PubMed ID: 23418921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National Norwegian Practice Patterns for Surgical Treatment of Kidney Cancer Tumors ≤7cm: Adherence to Changes in Guidelines May Improve Overall Survival.
    Hjelle KM; Johannesen TB; Bostad L; Reisæter LAR; Beisland C
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 31102628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy vs laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: comparison of complication rates in elderly patients during the initial phase of adoption.
    Becker A; Ravi P; Roghmann F; Trinh QD; Tian Z; Larouche A; Kim S; Shariat SF; Kluth L; Dahlem R; Fisch M; Graefen M; Eichelberg C; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M
    Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1285-91. PubMed ID: 24862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Logic regression for provider effects on kidney cancer treatment delivery.
    Banerjee M; Filson C; Xia R; Miller DC
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():316935. PubMed ID: 24795774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practice patterns among urologic surgeons treating localized renal cell carcinoma in the laparoscopic age: technology versus oncology.
    Scherr DS; Ng C; Munver R; Sosa RE; Vaughan ED; Del Pizzo J
    Urology; 2003 Dec; 62(6):1007-11. PubMed ID: 14665345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population-level comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for patients with kidney cancer.
    Tan HJ; Wolf JS; Ye Z; Wei JT; Miller DC
    Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4184-93. PubMed ID: 21365632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External validation of a model for tailoring the operative approach to minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
    Vricella GJ; Murray S; Boncher NA; Madi R
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1806-10. PubMed ID: 21040363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between surgical volume and outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery.
    Peyronnet B; Couapel JP; Patard JJ; Bensalah K
    Curr Opin Urol; 2014 Sep; 24(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 24887048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolving trends in the surgical management of renal masses over the past two decades: A contemporary picture from a large prospectively-maintained database.
    Chen K; Lee A; Huang HH; Tay KJ; Sim A; Lee LS; Cheng CWS; Ng LG; Ho HSS; Yuen JSP
    Int J Urol; 2019 Apr; 26(4):465-474. PubMed ID: 30818418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.