144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18330908)
1. Negative influence of changing biopsy practice patterns on the predictive value of prostate-specific antigen for cancer detection on prostate biopsy.
Schwartz MJ; Hwang DH; Hung AJ; Han J; McClain JW; Shemtov MM; Te AE; Sosa RE; Vaughan ED; Scherr DS
Cancer; 2008 Apr; 112(8):1718-25. PubMed ID: 18330908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital rectal examination in primary care is important for early detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis study.
Walsh AL; Considine SW; Thomas AZ; Lynch TH; Manecksha RP
Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Dec; 64(629):e783-7. PubMed ID: 25452543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate specific antigen density of the transition zone for early detection of prostate cancer.
Djavan B; Zlotta AR; Byttebier G; Shariat S; Omar M; Schulman CC; Marberger M
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):411-8; discussion 418-9. PubMed ID: 9679889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Early diagnosis of prostate carcinoma with reference to the density of prostate-specific antigen].
Schmid HP; Ravery V; Toublanc M; Boccon-Gibod L
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Sep; 126(36):1530-5. PubMed ID: 8927956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of a high prostate-specific antigen level for prostate cancer diagnosis upon initial biopsy in Korean men.
Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH
Yonsei Med J; 2007 Aug; 48(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 17722242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of low free to total PSA ratio in prostate cancer screening: detection rates, clinical and pathological findings in Brazilian men with serum PSA levels <4.0 ng/mL.
Faria EF; Carvalhal GF; dos Reis RB; Tobias-Machado M; Vieira RA; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Freitas CH; Magnabosco WJ; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E653-7. PubMed ID: 22892057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of transperineal six-core prostate biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination findings.
Luciani LG; De Giorgi G; Valotto C; Zanin M; Bierti S; Zattoni F
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):555-8. PubMed ID: 16527579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of malignant prostatic cells detection in blood for early detection of prostate cancer: comparison to prostatic biopsy.
Murray NP; Reyes E; Tapia P; Orellana N; Dueñas R; Fuentealba C; Badinez L
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Dec; 64(10):961-71. PubMed ID: 22228894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of the digital rectal examination as diagnostic test for prostate cancer detection in obese patients.
Dell'Atti L
J BUON; 2015; 20(6):1601-5. PubMed ID: 26854458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mass ratio in the detection of prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of ≤10 ng/mL.
Hong SK; Oh JJ; Byun SS; Hwang SI; Choo MS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E81-5. PubMed ID: 22093144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Systematic ultrasound guided transrectal core prostate biopsy based on serum level of prostate-specific antigen].
Yamaguchi S; Baba Y; Naito K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1997 Sep; 43(9):641-5. PubMed ID: 9365843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The digital rectal examination (DRE) remains important - outcomes from a contemporary cohort of men undergoing an initial 12-18 core prostate needle biopsy.
Palmerola R; Smith P; Elliot V; Reese CT; Mahon FB; Harpster LE; Icitovic N; Raman JD
Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6542-7. PubMed ID: 23228289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer detection: effectiveness, safety and predictive factors.
Utrera NM; Sánchez AT; Rodríguez-Antolín A; Martín-Parada A; Lora D; Passas J; González RD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Jun; 64(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 21705814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 6- and 12-core prostate biopsy in Taiwanese men: impact of total prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen density and prostate volume on prostate cancer detection.
Chiang IN; Chang SJ; Pu YS; Huang KH; Yu HJ; Huang CY
Urol Int; 2009; 82(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 19440012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A performance analysis of the presence of malignant circulating prostate cells as a predictive factor for the detection of prostate cancer in the first, second and third prostate biopsy.
Murray NP; Reyes E; Tapia P; Badinez L; Orellana N; Fuentealba C; Olivares R; Dueñas R
Arch Esp Urol; 2013 May; 66(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 23676536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of usefulness of prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in an unscreened population:experience in a Nigerian teaching hospital.
Ojewola RW; Tijani KH; Jeje EA; Ogunjimi MA; Anunobi CC; Adesanya AO
West Afr J Med; 2013; 32(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23613288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate-specific antigen testing in men between 40 and 70 years in Brazil: database from a check-up program.
Zambon JP; Almeida FG; Conceição RD; Tabone VA; Kashiwagi NM; Ross CL; Carvalho JA
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 25615243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer detection rate at second and third biopsy. Predictive factors and risk groups for cancer diagnosis.
Castello-Porcar A; García-Morata F; Martinez-Jabaloyas JM
Arch Esp Urol; 2014 Sep; 67(7):605-14. PubMed ID: 25241833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of additional sampling in the TRUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Stamatiou K; Alevizos A; Karanasiou V; Mariolis A; Mihas C; Papathanasiou M; Bovis K; Sofras F
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 17495488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
