195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1833116)
1. A relative cost-effectiveness analysis of different methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Sculpher MJ; Buxton MJ; Ferguson BA; Humphreys JE; Altman JF; Spiegelhalter DJ; Kirby AJ; Jacob JS; Bacon H; Dudbridge SB
Diabet Med; 1991; 8(7):644-50. PubMed ID: 1833116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for treatable diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of different methods.
Buxton MJ; Sculpher MJ; Ferguson BA; Humphreys JE; Altman JF; Spiegelhalter DJ; Kirby AJ; Jacob JS; Bacon H; Dudbridge SB
Diabet Med; 1991 May; 8(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 1830260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a relative cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative modalities and strategies.
Sculpher MJ; Buxton MJ; Ferguson BA; Spiegelhalter DJ; Kirby AJ
Health Econ; 1992 Apr; 1(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 1342628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness.
Tufail A; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Egan C; Rudisill C; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Bailey C; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(92):1-72. PubMed ID: 27981917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practical community screening for diabetic retinopathy using the mobile retinal camera: report of a 12 centre study. British Diabetic Association Mobile Retinal Screening Group.
Taylor R
Diabet Med; 1996 Nov; 13(11):946-52. PubMed ID: 8946152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A report on the use of technician ophthalmoscopy combined with the use of the Canon non-mydriatic camera in screening for diabetic retinopathy in the community.
Jacob J; Stead J; Sykes J; Taylor D; Tooke JE
Diabet Med; 1995 May; 12(5):419-25. PubMed ID: 7648805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of optometry vs digital photography screening for diabetic retinopathy in a single district.
Tu KL; Palimar P; Sen S; Mathew P; Khaleeli A
Eye (Lond); 2004 Jan; 18(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14707956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Lairson DR; Pugh JA; Kapadia AS; Lorimor RJ; Jacobson J; Velez R
Diabetes Care; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1369-77. PubMed ID: 1425103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preventing diabetes blindness: cost effectiveness of a screening programme using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy in a primary health care setting in South Africa.
Khan T; Bertram MY; Jina R; Mash B; Levitt N; Hofman K
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 101(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 23796361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
Li Z; Wu C; Olayiwola JN; Hilaire DS; Huang JJ
Conn Med; 2012 Feb; 76(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 22670358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adding retinal photography to screening for diabetic retinopathy: a prospective study in primary care.
O'Hare JP; Hopper A; Madhaven C; Charny M; Purewell TS; Harney B; Griffiths J
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7032):679-82. PubMed ID: 8597737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland.
Scotland GS; McNamee P; Philip S; Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Prescott GJ; Fonseca S; Sharp PF; Olson JA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 91(11):1518-23. PubMed ID: 17585001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness analysis of screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease.
James M; Turner DA; Broadbent DM; Vora J; Harding SP
BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7250):1627-31. PubMed ID: 10856062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current and possible screening practices for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: new evidence from a pilot survey of Oxfordshire general practitioners.
Smith AF
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 2(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 8963916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting: a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography.
Griffith SP; Freeman WL; Shaw CJ; Mitchell WH; Olden CR; Figgs LD; Kinyoun JL; Underwood DL; Will JC
J Fam Pract; 1993 Jul; 37(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8345340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of mobile screening unit for diabetic retinopathy in rural and urban areas.
Leese GP; Ahmed S; Newton RW; Jung RT; Ellingford A; Baines P; Roxburgh S; Coleiro J
BMJ; 1993 Jan; 306(6871):187-9. PubMed ID: 8443485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: ophthalmoscopy or retinal photography as 35 mm colour transparencies?
Owens DR; Gibbins RL; Lewis PA; Wall S; Allen JC; Morton R
Diabet Med; 1998 Feb; 15(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 9507921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of Autonomous Point-of-Care Diabetic Retinopathy Screening for Pediatric Patients With Diabetes.
Wolf RM; Channa R; Abramoff MD; Lehmann HP
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 138(10):1063-1069. PubMed ID: 32880616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mass screening for diabetic retinopathy--a report on diabetic retinal screening in primary care clinics in Singapore.
Lau HC; Voo YO; Yeo KT; Ling SL; Jap A
Singapore Med J; 1995 Oct; 36(5):510-3. PubMed ID: 8882536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of digital surveillance clinics with optical coherence tomography versus hospital eye service follow-up for patients with screen-positive maculopathy.
Leal J; Luengo-Fernandez R; Stratton IM; Dale A; Ivanova K; Scanlon PH
Eye (Lond); 2019 Apr; 33(4):640-647. PubMed ID: 30504828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
