These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18331666)

  • 1. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power of pairwise comparisons in the equal variance and unequal sample size case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):115-31. PubMed ID: 18482478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power evaluation of various modified Bonferroni procedures by a Monte Carlo study.
    Morikawa T; Terao A; Iwasaki M
    J Biopharm Stat; 1996 Jul; 6(3):343-59. PubMed ID: 8854237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Design and power analysis: n and confidence intervals of means].
    García JF; Pascual J; Frías MD; Van Krunckelsven D; Murgui S
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 18940106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of clustered matched-pair data.
    Durkalski VL; Palesch YY; Lipsitz SR; Rust PF
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2417-28. PubMed ID: 12872299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups.
    Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
    Chen X; Wei L
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments.
    Pawluk-Kołc M; Zieba-Palus J; Parczewski A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 160(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16221535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting a lack of association: an equivalence testing approach.
    Goertzen JR; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):527-37. PubMed ID: 20030968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple procedure to compute the sample size needed to compare two independent groups when the population variances are unequal.
    Singer J
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1089-95. PubMed ID: 11276038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the means and variances of a bivariate log-normal distribution.
    Bebu I; Mathew T
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2684-96. PubMed ID: 17907261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The homogenetic estimate for the variance of survival rate.
    Zhao G
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8614745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method and computer program for controlling the family-wise alpha rate in gene association studies involving multiple phenotypes.
    Allison DB; Beasley M
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 9523213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.
    Hittner JB; May K; Silver NC
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 12773018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studies.
    Hafdahl AR; Williams MA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 19271846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating slope and level change in N = 1 designs.
    Solanas A; Manolov R; Onghena P
    Behav Modif; 2010 May; 34(3):195-218. PubMed ID: 20234005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.