353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18331948)
21. A new approach to correct a Class III malocclusion with miniscrews: a case report.
Amini F; Poosti M
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2013 Mar; 41(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 23600162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment of skeletal 2 malocclusion using bone-plate anchorage. A case report.
Kraikosol K; Rattanayatikul C; Godfrey K; Vattraphudej T
Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17679538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MGBM system: new protocol for Class II non extraction treatment without cooperation.
Maino BG; Gianelly AA; Bednar J; Mura P; Maino G
Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 17364039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Induced ankylosis of a primary molar for skeletal anchorage in the mandible as alternative to mini-implants.
Angelopoulou MV; Koletsi D; Vadiakas G; Halazonetis DJ
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():18. PubMed ID: 26085484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Extreme dentoalveolar compensation in the treatment of Class III malocclusion.
Janson G; de Souza JE; Alves Fde A; Andrade P; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):787-94. PubMed ID: 16360922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combined use of miniscrews and clear appliances for the treatment of bialveolar protrusion without conventional brackets.
Choi NC; Park YC; Jo YM; Lee KJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):671-81. PubMed ID: 19409351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Treatment of Class II protrusion with severe crowding using indirect miniscrew anchorage.
Choi NC; Park YC; Lee HA; Lee KJ
Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1109-18. PubMed ID: 18004931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics.
Aboul-Ela SM; El-Beialy AR; El-Sayed KM; Selim EM; El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21300255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment.
Zablocki HL; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):852-60. PubMed ID: 18538249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nonsurgical treatment of a patient with a Class III malocclusion.
Moullas AT; Palomo JM; Gass JR; Amberman BD; White J; Gustovich D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4 Suppl):S111-8. PubMed ID: 16644413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality of occlusal outcome following space closure in cases of lower second premolar aplasia using lingual orthodontic molar mesialization without maxillary counterbalancing extraction.
Klang E; Beyling F; Knösel M; Wiechmann D
Head Face Med; 2018 Sep; 14(1):17. PubMed ID: 30249268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Miniscrew-assisted nonsurgical palatal expansion before orthognathic surgery for a patient with severe mandibular prognathism.
Lee KJ; Park YC; Park JY; Hwang WS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20685540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Utilization of third molars in the orthodontic treatment of skeletal class III subjects with severe lateral deviation: case report.
Kondo E; Ono M; Aoba TJ
World J Orthod; 2004; 5(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15612339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Orthopedic protraction with skeletal anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and hypodontia.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 16448286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Orthodontic miniplate with tube as an efficient tool for borderline cases.
Chung KR; Kim SH; Kang YG; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 21457867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Posterior impaction with orthodontic miniscrews for openbite closure and improvement of facial profile.
Kravitz ND; Kusnoto B
World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 17580510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Pavithranand A; Rajasigamani K; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 16627183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Orthodontic camouflage in the case of a skeletal class III malocclusion.
Costa Pinho TM; Ustrell Torrent JM; Correia Pinto JG
World J Orthod; 2004; 5(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 15612340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A pilot clinical study of Class III surgical patients facilitated by improved accelerated osteogenic orthodontic treatments.
Wu J; Jiang JH; Xu L; Liang C; Bai Y; Zou W
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):616-24. PubMed ID: 25347045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Skeletal Class lll severe openbite treatment using implant anchorage.
Sakai Y; Kuroda S; Murshid SA; Takano-Yamamoto T
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18193965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
