These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18332014)
1. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the Patient Evaluation Measure, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Michigan Hand Outcome Measure. Dias JJ; Rajan RA; Thompson JR J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2008 Feb; 33(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 18332014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and reliability of three generic outcome measures for hand disorders. Sharma R; Dias JJ J Hand Surg Br; 2000 Dec; 25(6):593-600. PubMed ID: 11106527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DASH questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms in industry workers: a validity and reliability study. Kitis A; Celik E; Aslan UB; Zencir M Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 18555973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Atroshi I; Gummesson C; Andersson B; Dahlgren E; Johansson A Acta Orthop Scand; 2000 Dec; 71(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 11145390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Michigan hand questionnaire. Roh YH; Yang BK; Noh JH; Baek GH; Song CH; Gong HS J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 36(9):1497-503. PubMed ID: 21783329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the German version of "the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)" as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures. Hemelaers L; Angst F; Drerup S; Simmen BR; Wood-Dauphinee S J Hand Ther; 2008; 21(4):366-76. PubMed ID: 19006763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Chung KC; Pillsbury MS; Walters MR; Hayward RA J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Jul; 23(4):575-87. PubMed ID: 9708370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Upper Limb Functional Index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Gabel CP; Michener LA; Burkett B; Neller A J Hand Ther; 2006; 19(3):328-48; quiz 349. PubMed ID: 16861132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. Kotsis SV; Chung KC J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jan; 30(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 15680560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a modern activity hand survey with respect to reliability, construct and criterion validity. Alexander M; Franko OI; Makhni EC; Zurakowski D; Day CS J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2008 Oct; 33(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 18977836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). Offenbaecher M; Ewert T; Sangha O; Stucki G J Rheumatol; 2002 Feb; 29(2):401-2. PubMed ID: 11838867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and responsiveness of the patient evaluation measure as an outcome measure for carpal tunnel syndrome. Hobby JL; Watts C; Elliot D J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Aug; 30(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 15936130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Translation into Greek, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). Themistocleous GS; Goudelis G; Kyrou I; Chloros GD; Krokos A; Galanos A; Gerostathopoulos NE; Soucacos PN J Hand Ther; 2006; 19(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 16861133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire: Determining functional activity profiles in patients with upper extremity disorders. Jester A; Harth A; Wind G; Germann G; Sauerbier M J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15620487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Massy-Westropp N; Krishnan J; Ahern M J Rheumatol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):1996-2001. PubMed ID: 15468366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) also valid and responsive in patients with neck complaints. Huisstede BM; Feleus A; Bierma-Zeinstra SM; Verhaar JA; Koes BW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):E130-8. PubMed ID: 19182703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in patients with hand injury. Horng YS; Lin MC; Feng CT; Huang CH; Wu HC; Wang JD J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 35(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 20138712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. Gay RE; Amadio PC; Johnson JC J Hand Surg Am; 2003 Mar; 28(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 12671856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. Gummesson C; Atroshi I; Ekdahl C BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2003 Jun; 4():11. PubMed ID: 12809562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]