BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18335011)

  • 1. Ankle bracing, plantar-flexion angle, and ankle muscle latencies during inversion stress in healthy participants.
    Kernozek T; Durall CJ; Friske A; Mussallem M
    J Athl Train; 2008; 43(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 18335011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces after prophylactic lace-up ankle bracing.
    DiStefano LJ; Padua DA; Brown CN; Guskiewicz KM
    J Athl Train; 2008; 43(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 18523572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of wearing an Ankle Stabilizing Orthosis (ASO) Ankle Brace on ankle joints kinetics and kinematics during a basketball rebounding task.
    Dewar RA; Arnold GP; Wang W; Drew TS; Abboud RJ
    Foot (Edinb); 2019 Sep; 40():34-38. PubMed ID: 31082670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of 3 ankle braces with and without free rotation in the sagittal plane.
    Alfuth M; Klein D; Koch R; Rosenbaum D
    J Athl Train; 2014; 49(5):608-16. PubMed ID: 25098661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Ankle Bracing on Kinematics in Simulated Sprain and Drop Landings: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    Agres AN; Chrysanthou M; Raffalt PC
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 May; 47(6):1480-1487. PubMed ID: 31042441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Ankle Bracing and Taping to Decrease Range of Motion and Velocity During Inversion Perturbation While Walking.
    Hall EA; Simon JE; Docherty CL
    J Athl Train; 2016 Apr; 51(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 27111586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of Novel Ankle Prophylactic Compared With Lace-Up Brace or Tape.
    Ihmels WD; Seymore KD; Brown TN
    J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Jul; 29(5):693-696. PubMed ID: 31899891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ankle bracing and the neuromuscular factors influencing joint stiffness.
    Zinder SM; Granata KP; Shultz SJ; Gansneder BM
    J Athl Train; 2009; 44(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 19593418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Mechanical Functionality of the EXO-L Ankle Brace: Assessment With a 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Stress Test.
    Kleipool RP; Natenstedt JJ; Streekstra GJ; Dobbe JG; Gerards RM; Blankevoort L; Tuijthof GJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Jan; 44(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 26589838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stabilizing effects of ankle bracing under a combination of inversion and axial compression loading.
    Tohyama H; Yasuda K; Beynnon BD; Renstrom PA
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2006 Apr; 14(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 15959767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of inversion and ankle bracing on peroneus longus Hoffmann reflex.
    Sefton JM; Hicks-Little CA; Koceja DM; Cordova ML
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2007 Oct; 17(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 17076833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Ankle Taping to Restrict Plantar Flexion on Ball and Foot Velocity During an Instep Kick in Soccer.
    Sasadai J; Urabe Y; Maeda N; Shinohara H; Fujii E
    J Sport Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 24(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 25115347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of sudden inversion stress on EMG activity of the peroneal and tibialis anterior muscles in the chronically unstable ankle.
    Ebig M; Lephart SM; Burdett RG; Miller MC; Pincivero DM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1997 Aug; 26(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 9243405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. People with chronic ankle instability benefit from brace application in highly dynamic change of direction movements.
    Fuerst P; Gollhofer A; Wenning M; Gehring D
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2021 Feb; 14(1):13. PubMed ID: 33596976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foot structure and muscle reaction time to a simulated ankle sprain.
    Denyer JR; Hewitt NL; Mitchell AC
    J Athl Train; 2013; 48(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 23675791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuromuscular control in individuals with chronic ankle instability: A comparison of unexpected and expected ankle inversion perturbations during a single leg drop-landing.
    Simpson JD; Stewart EM; Turner AJ; Macias DM; Wilson SJ; Chander H; Knight AC
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Apr; 64():133-141. PubMed ID: 30721787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 3 ankle braces in reducing ankle inversion in a basketball rebounding task.
    Dewar RA; Arnold GP; Wang W; Drew TS; Abboud RJ
    Foot (Edinb); 2019 Jun; 39():129-135. PubMed ID: 31147148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of high-top and low-top shoes on ankle inversion kinematics and muscle activation in landing on a tilted surface.
    Fu W; Fang Y; Liu Y; Hou J
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2014 Feb; 7(1):14. PubMed ID: 24548559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electromyographic latency changes in the ankle musculature during inversion moments.
    Lynch SA; Eklund U; Gottlieb D; Renstrom PA; Beynnon B
    Am J Sports Med; 1996; 24(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 8734889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lower Limb Biomechanics During Drop-Jump Landings on Challenging Surfaces in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability.
    Moisan G; Mainville C; Descarreaux M; Cantin V
    J Athl Train; 2022 Nov; 57(11-12):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 35090022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.