These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18335714)

  • 1. Strain pattern following surface replacement of the hip.
    Ganapathi M; Evans S; Roberts P
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Jan; 222(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 18335714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of positioning and notching of resurfaced femurs on femoral neck strength: a biomechanical test.
    Nabavi A; Yeoh KM; Shidiac L; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Turnbull A
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Apr; 17(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 19398793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanical and finite element analysis of femoral neck notching during hip resurfacing.
    Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Papini M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041002. PubMed ID: 19275431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
    Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthesis design and stress profile after hip resurfacing: a finite element analysis.
    Heijink A; Zobitz ME; Nuyts R; Morrey BF; An KN
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2008 Dec; 16(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 19126900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
    Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved implantation technique for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
    Wirth CJ; Gossé F
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2006 Sep; 18(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 16953347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical simulation of muscle loading on the proximal femur: analysis of cemented femoral component migration with and without muscle loading.
    Britton JR; Walsh LA; Prendergast PJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2003 Aug; 18(7):637-46. PubMed ID: 12880711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G; Duggineni R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postural balance during quiet standing in patients with total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Nantel J; Termoz N; Centomo H; Lavigne M; Vendittoli PA; Prince F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 May; 23(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 18079029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of acetabular cup size on the short-term stability of revision hip arthroplasty: a finite element investigation.
    Phillips AT; Pankaj ; Usmani AS; Howie CR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 15376726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
    Wik TS
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A plasma-sprayed titanium proximal coating reduces the risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty.
    Miles B; Walter WL; Kolos E; Waters T; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Donohoo S; Ruys AJ
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 25(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 26407113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Greater trochanteric fixation using a cable system for partial hip arthroplasty: a clinical and finite element analysis.
    Ozan F; Koyuncu S; Pekedis M; Altay T; Yıldız H; Toker G
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():931537. PubMed ID: 25177703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis.
    Wik TS; Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Aamodt A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 20190322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.