206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18336986)
1. Marginal leakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
Ferreira MC; Vieira RS
J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 18336986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the internal conditioning of indirect restorations of resin composite in relation to microleakage using LEDs and QTH units.
Calabrez-Filho S; Calabrez VC; Reston EG; de Andrade MF; Borges LH
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 19544818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
Fourie J; Smit CF
SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage in resin composite restorations after antimicrobial pre-treatments: effect of KTP laser, chlorhexidine gluconate and Clearfil Protect Bond.
Siso HS; Kustarci A; Göktolga EG
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 19544822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Class II restorations with margins below the CEJ.
Kanca J; Greitzer G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 19508264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
Sadeghi M
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
