These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18337697)

  • 41. Dominant TEL1-hy mutations compensate for Mec1 lack of functions in the DNA damage response.
    Baldo V; Testoni V; Lucchini G; Longhese MP
    Mol Cell Biol; 2008 Jan; 28(1):358-75. PubMed ID: 17954565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. High density of unrepaired genomic ribonucleotides leads to Topoisomerase 1-mediated severe growth defects in absence of ribonucleotide reductase.
    Cerritelli SM; Iranzo J; Sharma S; Chabes A; Crouch RJ; Tollervey D; El Hage A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 May; 48(8):4274-4297. PubMed ID: 32187369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cell cycle- and ribonucleotide reductase-driven changes in mtDNA copy number influence mtDNA Inheritance without compromising mitochondrial gene expression.
    Lebedeva MA; Shadel GS
    Cell Cycle; 2007 Aug; 6(16):2048-57. PubMed ID: 17721079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. MEC3, MEC1, and DDC2 are essential components of a telomere checkpoint pathway required for cell cycle arrest during senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Enomoto S; Glowczewski L; Berman J
    Mol Biol Cell; 2002 Aug; 13(8):2626-38. PubMed ID: 12181334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Elg1 forms an alternative RFC complex important for DNA replication and genome integrity.
    Bellaoui M; Chang M; Ou J; Xu H; Boone C; Brown GW
    EMBO J; 2003 Aug; 22(16):4304-13. PubMed ID: 12912927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Rad53 kinase activation-independent replication checkpoint function of the N-terminal forkhead-associated (FHA1) domain.
    Pike BL; Tenis N; Heierhorst J
    J Biol Chem; 2004 Sep; 279(38):39636-44. PubMed ID: 15271990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Rad53 regulates replication fork restart after DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Szyjka SJ; Aparicio JG; Viggiani CJ; Knott S; Xu W; Tavaré S; Aparicio OM
    Genes Dev; 2008 Jul; 22(14):1906-20. PubMed ID: 18628397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Interaction between checkpoint genes RAD9, RAD17, RAD24, and RAD53 involved in the determination of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae sensitivity to ionizing radiation].
    Koltovaia NA; Nikulushkina IuV; Kadyshevskaia EIu; Roshchina MP; Devin AB
    Genetika; 2008 Aug; 44(8):1045-55. PubMed ID: 18825953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The ATM-related Tel1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae controls a checkpoint response following phleomycin treatment.
    Nakada D; Shimomura T; Matsumoto K; Sugimoto K
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2003 Mar; 31(6):1715-24. PubMed ID: 12626713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage.
    Bonilla CY; Melo JA; Toczyski DP
    Mol Cell; 2008 May; 30(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 18471973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mechanism of Dun1 activation by Rad53 phosphorylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Chen SH; Smolka MB; Zhou H
    J Biol Chem; 2007 Jan; 282(2):986-95. PubMed ID: 17114794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Non-catalytic function for ATR in the checkpoint response.
    McSherry TD; Kitazono AA; Javaheri A; Kron SJ; Mueller PR
    Cell Cycle; 2007 Aug; 6(16):2019-30. PubMed ID: 17721080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mdt1, a novel Rad53 FHA1 domain-interacting protein, modulates DNA damage tolerance and G(2)/M cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Pike BL; Yongkiettrakul S; Tsai MD; Heierhorst J
    Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 24(7):2779-88. PubMed ID: 15024067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants.
    Schmidt KH; Kolodner RD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Nov; 103(48):18196-201. PubMed ID: 17114288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Highly mutagenic and severely imbalanced dNTP pools can escape detection by the S-phase checkpoint.
    Kumar D; Viberg J; Nilsson AK; Chabes A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jul; 38(12):3975-83. PubMed ID: 20215435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Phosphorylation of Sae2 Mediates Forkhead-associated (FHA) Domain-specific Interaction and Regulates Its DNA Repair Function.
    Liang J; Suhandynata RT; Zhou H
    J Biol Chem; 2015 Apr; 290(17):10751-63. PubMed ID: 25762720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Impaired mitochondrial Fe-S cluster biogenesis activates the DNA damage response through different signaling mediators.
    Pijuan J; María C; Herrero E; Bellí G
    J Cell Sci; 2015 Dec; 128(24):4653-65. PubMed ID: 26567217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint.
    Weiss E; Winey M
    J Cell Biol; 1996 Jan; 132(1-2):111-23. PubMed ID: 8567717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rad53 checkpoint kinase phosphorylation site preference identified in the Swi6 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Sidorova JM; Breeden LL
    Mol Cell Biol; 2003 May; 23(10):3405-16. PubMed ID: 12724400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage.
    Paulovich AG; Margulies RU; Garvik BM; Hartwell LH
    Genetics; 1997 Jan; 145(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 9017389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.