287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18337847)
1. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
Hølund B; Grinsted P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Organized cervical cancer screening for underpriviledged women].
Piana L; Leandri FX; Jacqueme B; Heid P; Corti J; Andrac-Meyer L; Sancho-Garnier H
Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 17535784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. A one-year registration of cervical cytological tests].
Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 8191435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical mass screening in Norway--510,000 smears a year.
Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 7867019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Incidence and mortality of uterine cervix cancer in Norway. When do we get organized nation-wide cytologic screening in Norway?].
Magnus K; Langmark F
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May; 110(12):1557-9. PubMed ID: 2187277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective cervical cytology screening programmes in middle-income countries: the Chilean experience.
Sepúlveda C; Prado R
Cancer Detect Prev; 2005; 29(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 16188399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening over cervical cancer mortality among Japanese women.
Aklimunnessa K; Mori M; Khan MM; Sakauchi F; Kubo T; Fujino Y; Suzuki S; Tokudome S; Tamakoshi A; ; Motohashi Y; Tsuji I; Nakamura Y; Iso H; Mikami H; Inaba Y; Hoshiyama Y; Suzuki H; Shimizu H; Toyoshima H; Wakai K; Ito Y; Hashimoto S; Kikuchi S; Koizumi A; Kawamura T; Watanabe Y; Miki T; Date C; Sakata K; Nose T; Hayakawa N; Yoshimura T; Shibata A; Okamoto N; Shino H; Ohno Y; Kitagawa T; Kuroki T; Tajima K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 36(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 16844732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the effect of Papanicolaou screening in Sweden: record linkage between a central screening registry and the National Cancer Registry.
Pettersson F; Näslund I; Malker B
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):91-105. PubMed ID: 3570419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer in Croatia: state of the art and possibilities for prevention.
Znaor A; Strnad M
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():37-40. PubMed ID: 17598503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
Lynge E; Poll P
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
