These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18338560)

  • 1. [Effect of stimulus intensity on auditory event-related potentials evoked by tone and speech].
    Ouyang T; Liang Y; Li S
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 18338560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative study of pure tone stimuli and Chinese speech stimuli on auditory event-related potentials].
    Liang Y; Ouyang TB
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 43(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 18510214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms.
    Burger M; Hoppe U; Lohscheller J; Eysholdt U; Döllinger M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19050643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical auditory evoked potentials to acoustic changes in speech stimuli in children.
    Kummer P; Burger M; Schuster M; Rosanowski F; Eysholdt U; Hoppe U
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 17726331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory evoked potentials to tones and syllables in adults: evidence of specific influence on N250 wave.
    Vidal J; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Roux S; Bruneau N
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Apr; 378(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15781148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The interaction between somatosensory and auditory cognitive processing assessed with event-related potentials.
    Touge T; Gonzalez D; Wu J; Deguchi K; Tsukaguchi M; Shimamura M; Ikeda K; Kuriyama S
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 25(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 18340272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurophysiological indices of speech and nonspeech stimulus processing.
    Tampas JW; Harkrider AW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1147-64. PubMed ID: 16411803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resolving precise temporal processing properties of the auditory system using continuous stimuli.
    Lalor EC; Power AJ; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jul; 102(1):349-59. PubMed ID: 19439675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of task-irrelevant high-speed verbal stimulation on a visual/verbal word-discrimination task: an event-related potential study.
    Uemura J; Hoshiyama M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 121(12):2065-9. PubMed ID: 20566301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of different noise types on the speech and non-speech elicited mismatch negativity.
    Kozou H; Kujala T; Shtyrov Y; Toppila E; Starck J; Alku P; Näätänen R
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):31-9. PubMed ID: 15574298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload.
    Miller MW; Rietschel JC; McDonald CG; Hatfield BD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 21320552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related potentials in response to 3-D auditory stimuli.
    Fuchigami T; Okubo O; Fujita Y; Kohira R; Arakawa C; Endo A; Haruyama W; Imai Y; Mugishima H
    Brain Dev; 2009 Sep; 31(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 18938052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The characteristics of evoked potentials due to omission of stimuli in a sequence of rhythmic auditory tones].
    Gurtubay IG; Artieda J
    Rev Neurol; 1999 Sep 1-15; 29(5):403-7. PubMed ID: 10584241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in sensory evoked responses coincide with rapid improvement in speech identification performance.
    Alain C; Campeanu S; Tremblay K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 22(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 19485700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory-evoked potentials to frequency increase and decrease of high- and low-frequency tones.
    Pratt H; Starr A; Michalewski HJ; Dimitrijevic A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 19070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.