These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18338672)

  • 1. On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
    Tanno T; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 18338672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Free-operant performance on variable interval schedules with a linear feedback loop: no evidence for molar sensitivities in rats.
    Reed P; Soh M; Hildebrandt T; DeJongh J; Shek WY
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Oct; 26(4):416-27. PubMed ID: 11056882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 21048229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rats' performance on variable-interval schedules with a linear feedback loop between response rate and reinforcement rate.
    Reed P; Hildebrandt T; DeJongh J; Soh M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 12822684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of required response force on rats' performance on a VI+ schedule of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2006 Nov; 34(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 17330529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-sample discrimination of different schedules' reinforced interresponse times.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 19794831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of variable schedules is controlled by interresponse times proximal to reinforcement.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 23144509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 11497319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response-bout analysis of interresponse times in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
    Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2016 Nov; 132():12-21. PubMed ID: 27619956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An experimental analysis of steady-state response rate components on variable ratio and variable interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20718555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variable-ratio schedules as variable-interval schedules with linear feedback loops.
    McDowell JJ; Wixted JT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Nov; 46(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 3805974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Briefly delayed reinforcement effects on variable-ratio and yoked-interval schedule performance.
    Holtyn AF; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 23900853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple determinants of transfer of evaluative function after conditioning with free-operant schedules of reinforcement.
    Dack C; Reed P; McHugh L
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):348-66. PubMed ID: 21048226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The copyist model of response emission.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):759-78. PubMed ID: 22673925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cooperative responding in rats maintained by fixed- and variable-ratio schedules.
    de Carvalho LC; Dos Santos L; Regaço A; Barbosa TB; da Silva RF; de Souza DDG; Sandaker I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jul; 110(1):105-126. PubMed ID: 29959779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interlocking schedules: the relationship between response and time requirements.
    Rider DP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Jul; 28(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 903743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EMG biofeedback: the effects of CRF, FR, VR, FI, and VI schedules of reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of increases in forearm muscle tension.
    Cohen SL; Richardson J; Klebez J; Febbo S; Tucker D
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2001 Sep; 26(3):179-94. PubMed ID: 11680282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rats show molar sensitivity to different aspects of random-interval-with-linear-feedback-functions and random-ratio schedules.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):432-43. PubMed ID: 25915752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.