These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1833971)

  • 21. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a so-called 'dual-cured glass-ionomer cement' and a conventional resin composite used in orthodontic bonding.
    Phijaisanit P; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Oct; 15(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 9528399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Probability of failure of orthodontic brackets bonded with different cementing agents.
    Mitchell CA; O'Hagan E; Walker JM
    Dent Mater; 1995 Sep; 11(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 8595828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial.
    Gillgrass TJ; Benington PC; Millett DT; Newell J; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11455377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Romeo A; de la Higuera B; García-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tensile and shear strength of orthodontic bracket bonding with glass ionomer cement and acrylic resin. An in vitro comparison.
    Norevall LI; Sjögren G; Persson M
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 2096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bond strengths of orthodontic bonding materials: an in-vitro study.
    Fox NA; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 1911690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets.
    Blalock KA; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 7771364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Cacciafesta V; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Süssenberger U; Miethke RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 9563355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of enamel etching on tensile bond strength of brackets bonded in vivo with a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Rosenbach G; Cal-Neto JP; Oliveira SR; Chevitarese O; Almeida MA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 17029543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
    Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements.
    Meehan MP; Foley TF; Mamandras AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 9971921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of delayed light exposure on bond strength: light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement vs light-cured resin.
    Komori A; Ishikawa H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Aug; 116(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 10434086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative SEM studies of the enamel surface appearance following the use of glass ionomer cement and a diacrylate resin for bracket bonding.
    Ostman-Andersson E; Marcusson A; Hörstedt P
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 8236031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orthodontic bonding using glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study.
    Evans R; Oliver R
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec; 13(6):493-500. PubMed ID: 1840104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of thermocycling on the bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study.
    Arici S; Arici N
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):692-6. PubMed ID: 14719734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adhesive thickness effects on the bond strength of a light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Arici S; Caniklioglu CM; Arici N; Ozer M; Oguz B
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 15825792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.