177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18339724)
1. Head and neck paragangliomas: value of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography.
Neves F; Huwart L; Jourdan G; Reizine D; Herman P; Vicaut E; Guichard JP
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 May; 29(5):883-9. PubMed ID: 18339724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Head and neck paragangliomas: improved tumor detection using contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography as compared with fat-suppressed MR imaging techniques.
van den Berg R; Verbist BM; Mertens BJ; van der Mey AG; van Buchem MA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 May; 25(5):863-70. PubMed ID: 15140737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of MR angiography techniques in the detection of head and neck paragangliomas.
van den Berg R; Schepers A; de Bruïne FT; Liauw L; Mertens BJ; van der Mey AG; van Buchem MA
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 52(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15544901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR diagnosis of paraganglioma of the head and neck: value of contrast enhancement.
van Gils AP; van den Berg R; Falke TH; Bloem JL; Prins HJ; Dillon EH; van der Mey AG; Pauwels EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 8273654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Cirillo M; Righi C; Simionato F; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Kirchin MA; Scotti G
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Sep; 29(8):1530-6. PubMed ID: 18556359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unenhanced 3D turbo spin-echo MR angiography of lower limbs in peripheral arterial disease: a comparative study with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
Diop AD; Braidy C; Habouchi A; Niang K; Gageanu C; Boyer L; Chabrot P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1145-50. PubMed ID: 23617502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimized time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA at 3T: appreciating the feasibility of assessing cervical paragangliomas.
Ferré JC; Brunet JF; Carsin-Nicol B; Larralde A; Godey B; Gauvrit JY
J Neuroradiol; 2010 May; 37(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 19781784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Hansmann J; Morelli JN; Michaely HJ; Riester T; Budjan J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1486-93. PubMed ID: 24338813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants.
Johnson DB; Lerner CA; Prince MR; Kazanjian SN; Narasimham DL; Leichtman AB; Cho KJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9084020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal MRI sequence for identifying occlusion location in acute stroke: which value of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA?
Le Bras A; Raoult H; Ferré JC; Ronzière T; Gauvrit JY
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1081-8. PubMed ID: 25767186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of brain and head and neck tumors with 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T.
Nishimura S; Hirai T; Shigematsu Y; Kitajima M; Morioka M; Kai Y; Minoda R; Uetani H; Murakami R; Yamashita Y
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 Mar; 33(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 22116118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Angeretti MG; Lumia D; Canì A; Barresi M; Nocchi Cardim L; Piacentino F; Maresca AM; Novario R; Genovese EA; Fugazzola C
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D non-contrast-enhanced ECG-gated MR angiography of the lower extremities with dual-source radiofrequency transmission at 3.0 T: Intraindividual comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography in PAOD patients.
Rasper M; Wildgruber M; Settles M; Eckstein HH; Zimmermann A; Reeps C; Rummeny EJ; Huber AM
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):2871-80. PubMed ID: 26560724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multistation whole-body high-spatial-resolution MR angiography using a 32-channel MR system.
Nael K; Ruehm SG; Michaely HJ; Saleh R; Lee M; Laub G; Finn JP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):529-39. PubMed ID: 17242265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraindividual assessment of the thoracic aorta using contrast and non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Henninger V; Grünberg KM; Giesel FL; Böckler D; Krummenauer F; Kauczor HU; Ley S
Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 19229788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of fast highly undersampled contrast-enhanced MR angiography (sparse CE-MRA) in intracranial applications - initial study.
Gratz M; Schlamann M; Goericke S; Maderwald S; Quick HH
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1004-1011. PubMed ID: 27300194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supra-aortic arteries: three-dimensional time-resolved k-t BLAST contrast-enhanced MRA using a nondedicated body coil at 3 tesla in acute ischemic stroke.
Ferré JC; Raoult H; Breil S; Carsin-Nicol B; Ronzière T; Gauvrit JY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24222649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR angiography of carotid artery aneurysms in a porcine model at 3 Tesla: comparison of two different macrocyclic gadolinium chelates and of dynamic and conventional techniques.
Wuesten O; Morelli JN; Miller MW; Tuzun E; Lenox MW; Fossum TW; Trelles M; Cotes C; Krombach GA; Runge VM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1203-12. PubMed ID: 22826184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
