These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18339724)

  • 21. Three-dimensional cerebral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography at 3.0 Tesla: initial results using highly accelerated parallel acquisition.
    Nael K; Fenchel M; Salamon N; Duckwiler GR; Laub G; Finn JP; Villablanca JP
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Oct; 41(10):763-8. PubMed ID: 16971800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The value of a rapid contrast-enhanced angio-MRI protocol in the detection of head and neck paragangliomas in SDHx mutations carriers: a retrospective study on behalf of the PGL.EVA investigators.
    Gravel G; Niccoli P; Rohmer V; Moulin G; Borson-Chazot F; Rousset P; Pasco-Papon A; Marcus C; Dubrulle F; Gouya H; Bidault F; Dupas B; Gabrillargues J; Caumont-Prim A; Hernigou A; Gimenez-Roqueplo AP; Halimi P
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1696-704. PubMed ID: 26427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms.
    Cirillo M; Scomazzoni F; Cirillo L; Cadioli M; Simionato F; Iadanza A; Kirchin M; Righi C; Anzalone N
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e853-9. PubMed ID: 24103356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High-resolution steady state magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: are intravascular agents necessary?: feasibility and preliminary experience with gadobenate dimeglumine.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Kirchin MA; Neira C; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec; 44(12):784-92. PubMed ID: 19858728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries using 0.5 Tesla: comparison with selective digital angiography].
    Barbier C; Lefèvre F; Bui P; Denny P; Aiouaz C; Becker S
    J Radiol; 2001 Mar; 82(3 Pt 1):245-9. PubMed ID: 11287855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vascularization of head and neck paragangliomas: comparison of three MR angiographic techniques with digital subtraction angiography.
    van den Berg R; Wasser MN; van Gils AP; van der Mey AG; Hermans J; van Buchem MA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2000 Jan; 21(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 10669244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA.
    Zhang J; Ding S; Zhao H; Sun B; Li X; Zhou Y; Wan J; Degnan AJ; Xu J; Zhu C
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Continuously moving table aorto-iliofemoral run-off contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: image quality analysis in comparison to the multistep acquisition.
    Asbach P; Meade MD; Sattenberg RJ; Klessen C; Huppertz A; Heidenreich JO
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Apr; 55(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 24078458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Head-to-head comparison between
    Heimburger C; Veillon F; Taïeb D; Goichot B; Riehm S; Petit-Thomas J; Averous G; Cavalcanti M; Hubelé F; Chabrier G; Namer IJ; Charpiot A; Imperiale A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jun; 44(6):979-987. PubMed ID: 28050631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: comparison of three-dimensional (3D) navigated steady-state free-precession (SSFP), 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP.
    Potthast S; Mitsumori L; Stanescu LA; Richardson ML; Branch K; Dubinsky TJ; Maki JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 20027585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Low-dose, time-resolved, contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in the assessment of the abdominal aorta and its major branches at 3 Tesla.
    Kramer U; Fenchel M; Laub G; Seeger A; Klumpp B; Bretschneider C; Finn JP; Claussen CD; Miller S
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):564-76. PubMed ID: 20171907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. High-resolution 3D unenhanced ECG-gated respiratory-navigated MR angiography of the renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Mohrs OK; Petersen SE; Schulze T; Zieschang M; Küx H; Schmitt P; Bergemann S; Kauczor HU
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1423-8. PubMed ID: 21098205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering with CE-MRA in imaging of the thoracic aorta.
    Pennig L; Wagner A; Weiss K; Lennartz S; Huntgeburth M; Hickethier T; Maintz D; Naehle CP; Bunck AC; Doerner J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jan; 37(1):315-329. PubMed ID: 32852711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of facial arteries for pre-operative evaluation of vascularized submental lymph node flaps.
    Wu MC; Hsu MY; Shie RF; Cheng MH; Chu FI; Lin CY; Fan YP; Chu SY
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Aug; 19(1):68. PubMed ID: 31420022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Low-dose, time-resolved, contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in cardiac and vascular diseases: correlation to high spatial resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.
    Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Lohan DG; Tran L; Finn JP; Ruehm SG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):744-55. PubMed ID: 18555032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRA.
    Khoo MM; Deeab D; Gedroyc WM; Duncan N; Taube D; Dick EA
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Jul; 21(7):1470-6. PubMed ID: 21337034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical Evaluation of Silent T1-Weighted MRI and Silent MR Angiography of the Brain.
    Holdsworth SJ; Macpherson SJ; Yeom KW; Wintermark M; Zaharchuk G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):404-411. PubMed ID: 29112472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA (TWIST) with gadofosveset trisodium in the classification of soft-tissue vascular anomalies in the head and neck in children following updated 2014 ISSVA classification: first report on systematic evaluation of MRI and TWIST in a cohort of 47 children.
    Higgins LJ; Koshy J; Mitchell SE; Weiss CR; Carson KA; Huisman TA; Tekes A
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Jan; 71(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 26474946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining > or = 70% internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Babiarz LS; Romero JM; Murphy EK; Brobeck B; Schaefer PW; González RG; Lev MH
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Apr; 30(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 19164440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.