157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18339906)
1. Scientific misconduct. Two papers from Korean lab found to lack 'scientific truth'.
Couzin J; Normile D
Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5869):1468-9. PubMed ID: 18339906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct. Science retracts discredited paper; bitter patent dispute continues.
Normile D
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):450-1. PubMed ID: 19390012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific publishing. Retracted papers spur million-dollar lawsuit.
Travis J
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5747):425. PubMed ID: 16239453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Plagiarism and misconduct in scientific publishing.
Jones DS
J Pharm Pharmacol; 2009 May; 61(5):539. PubMed ID: 19405991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The truth about professor Hwang Woo-Suk (2)].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2006 Jan; 2(48):172. PubMed ID: 16463807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Truth management.
Catt I
East Afr Med J; 1992 Jul; 69(7):401. PubMed ID: 1396199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The 'truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...'.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 19041445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct. Timeline of events.
Science; 2009 Oct; 326(5953):650. PubMed ID: 19900901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cheating in scientific publishing: the scourge must stop!
Lee SS
Liver Int; 2008 May; 28(5):585-6. PubMed ID: 18433386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Scientific misconduct].
Fernández del Castillo C
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2002 Jun; 70():261-2. PubMed ID: 12216540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct.
Galyean M
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1035. PubMed ID: 18417753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Publish, or not publish? More regulation or better motivation? The enemy is apathy.
Thornton H
Int J Surg; 2007 Feb; 5(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17386906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific community. University clears Chinese biophysicist of misconduct.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5773):511. PubMed ID: 16645056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct. Falsification charge highlights image-manipulation standards.
Vogel G
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):356. PubMed ID: 18927360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. When the quest for truth falters: the issue of scientific misconduct.
Lamb DJ
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 17997428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Committee on Publication Ethics flow charts on suspected publication misconduct.
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Maturitas; 2009 Mar; 62(3):208-24. PubMed ID: 19329007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Truth: Keeping Us on Track in Scientific Publishing.
Freeman MP
J Clin Psychiatry; 2024 Feb; 85(1):. PubMed ID: 38324730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
