These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18341139)

  • 1. Front- or rear-weighted track start or grab start: which is the best for female swimmers?
    Welcher RL; Hinrichs RN; George TR
    Sports Biomech; 2008 Jan; 7(1):100-13. PubMed ID: 18341139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical analysis of the grab, track and handle swimming starts: an intervention study.
    Blanksby B; Nicholson L; Elliott B
    Sports Biomech; 2002 Jan; 1(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 14658133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of a resistance training programme on the grab, track and swing starts in swimming.
    Breed RV; Young WB
    J Sports Sci; 2003 Mar; 21(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 12703850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of the track start and the modified one-handed track start in competitive swimming: an intervention study.
    Galbraith H; Scurr J; Hencken C; Wood L; Graham-Smith P
    J Appl Biomech; 2008 Nov; 24(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 19075299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of elite and well-trained sprinters during sprint start.
    Slawinski J; Bonnefoy A; Levêque JM; Ontanon G; Riquet A; Dumas R; Chèze L
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Apr; 24(4):896-905. PubMed ID: 19935105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of grab start between elite and trained swimmers.
    Vantorre J; Seifert L; Fernandes RJ; Boas JP; Chollet D
    Int J Sports Med; 2010 Dec; 31(12):887-93. PubMed ID: 20862626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional Role of the Front and Back Legs During a Track Start with Special Reference to an Inverted Pendulum Model in College Swimmers.
    Ikeda Y; Ichikawa H; Nara R; Baba Y; Shimoyama Y; Kubo Y
    J Appl Biomech; 2016 Oct; 32(5):462-8. PubMed ID: 27249233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different kick start positions on OMEGA OSB11 blocks on free swimming time to 15m in developmental level swimmers.
    Barlow H; Halaki M; Stuelcken M; Greene A; Sinclair PJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Apr; 34():178-86. PubMed ID: 24636696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the efficiency between the grab and track starts for both genders in greek young swimmers.
    Thanopoulos V; Rozi G; Okičić T; Dopsaj M; Jorgić B; Madić D; Veličković S; Milanović Z; Spanou F; Batis E
    J Hum Kinet; 2012 May; 32():43-51. PubMed ID: 23486557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of angular momentum effect on swimming kick-start performance.
    Taladriz S; de la Fuente-Caynzos B; Arellano R
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1789-1793. PubMed ID: 27113536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On-block mechanistic determinants of start performance in high performance swimmers.
    Thng S; Pearson S; Mitchell LJG; Meulenbroek C; Keogh JWL
    Sports Biomech; 2024 May; 23(5):682-694. PubMed ID: 33666145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of inclination and position of new swimming starting block's back plate on track-start performance.
    Takeda T; Takagi H; Tsubakimoto S
    Sports Biomech; 2012 Sep; 11(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 23072047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different profiles of the aerial start phase in front crawl.
    Seifert L; Vantorre J; Lemaitre F; Chollet D; Toussaint HM; Vilas-Boas JP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):507-16. PubMed ID: 20072047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between different push-off variables and start performance in experienced swimmers.
    García-Ramos A; Feriche B; de la Fuente B; Argüelles-Cienfuegos J; Strojnik V; Strumbelj B; Štirn I
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2015; 15(8):687-95. PubMed ID: 26305175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Backstroke start performance: the impact of using the Omega OBL2 backstroke ledge.
    Barkwell GE; Dickey JP
    Sports Biomech; 2018 Nov; 17(4):429-441. PubMed ID: 28975846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Key determinants of time to 5 m in different ventral swimming start techniques.
    Peterson Silveira R; Stergiou P; Figueiredo P; Castro FS; Katz L; Stefanyshyn DJ
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2018 Nov; 18(10):1317-1326. PubMed ID: 29938588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anthropometry-driven block setting improves starting block performance in sprinters.
    Cavedon V; Sandri M; Pirlo M; Petrone N; Zancanaro C; Milanese C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213979. PubMed ID: 30917173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a 6-week plyometric training program on performances in pubescent swimmers.
    Potdevin FJ; Alberty ME; Chevutschi A; Pelayo P; Sidney MC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jan; 25(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 21157388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of body position and mass centre velocity at toe off on the start performance of elite swimmers and how this differs between gender.
    Shepherd I; Lindley MR; Logan O; Mears A; Pain MTG; King M
    Sports Biomech; 2023 Dec; 22(12):1659-1668. PubMed ID: 34008475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of hand and foot force to take-off velocity for the kick-start in competitive swimming.
    Takeda T; Sakai S; Takagi H; Okuno K; Tsubakimoto S
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Mar; 35(6):565-571. PubMed ID: 27149652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.