These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18341158)

  • 1. Sections 37/41 Mental Health Act 1983: a study of judges' practice and assessment of risk to the public.
    Qurashi I; Shaw J
    Med Sci Law; 2008 Jan; 48(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18341158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The double-edged sword: does biomechanism increase or decrease judges' sentencing of psychopaths?
    Aspinwall LG; Brown TR; Tabery J
    Science; 2012 Aug; 337(6096):846-9. PubMed ID: 22904010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'What on earth can this possibly mean'? French reentry courts and experts' risk assessment.
    Herzog-Evans M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 44():98-108. PubMed ID: 26338494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From discretion to disagreement: explaining disparities in judges' pretrial decisions.
    Dhami MK
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(3):367-86. PubMed ID: 15549716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What medical school did you graduate from? Judicial prescribing of medical treatments.
    Miller RD
    J Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(2):215-33. PubMed ID: 12546011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of risk assessment on judges' fairness in sentencing relatively poor defendants.
    Skeem J; Scurich N; Monahan J
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 31928034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. So you're sorry? The role of remorse in criminal law.
    Zhong R; Baranoski M; Feigenson N; Davidson L; Buchanan A; Zonana HV
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24618518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transferring juvenile defendants from adult to juvenile court: how Maryland forensic evaluators and judges reach their decisions.
    Means RF; Heller LD; Janofsky JS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 22960915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Bad or mad? Thinking in terms of 'bad or mad' and the (possible) prosecution of offenses committed by the mentally ill].
    Visscher AJ; van de Kraats GB; van der Goot B; Braam AW
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2015; 57(7):480-8. PubMed ID: 26189416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Treatment of offenders with mental disorders: focusing on prison psychiatry].
    Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2011; 113(5):458-67. PubMed ID: 21706853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mental health services in the courts: a program review.
    Macfarlane D; Lurie S; Bettridge S; Barbaree H
    Health Law Can; 2004 Nov; 25(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 15581135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crime and Punishment (Scotland) Act 1997: a survey of sentencers' views concerning the Scottish 'hybrid order'.
    Darjee R; Crichton J; Thomson L
    Med Sci Law; 2002 Jan; 42(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 11848143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Forensic psychiatry in Norway. A review of the period 1980-93].
    Noreik K; Grünfeld B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Mar; 116(8):983-7. PubMed ID: 8650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forensic mental health assessment in France: recommendations for quality improvement.
    Combalbert N; Andronikof A; Armand M; Robin C; Bazex H
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 24631526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The psychiatric report as moral tool: a case study in a French district court.
    Fernandez F; Lézé S
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 116():41-8. PubMed ID: 24973573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judicial perspectives on mental health courts: The role of psychiatric disorder and violence risk.
    Simonsson P; Farwell MM; Solomon PL
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 70():101562. PubMed ID: 32482300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychiatrists, criminals, and the law: forensic psychiatry in Switzerland 1850-1950.
    Germann U
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 24145062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical and judicial perceptions of the risks associated with use of antipsychotic medication.
    Bursztajn H; Chanowitz B; Kaplan E; Gutheil TG; Hamm RM; Alexander V
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 1685680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.