These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18341158)

  • 61. When judges practice psychiatry.
    Khurshid KA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(3):398-9. PubMed ID: 18802191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Structured risk assessment in community forensic mental health practice.
    Green B; Carroll A; Brett A
    Australas Psychiatry; 2010 Dec; 18(6):538-41. PubMed ID: 21117840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Improving forensic tribunal decisions: the role of the clinician.
    McKee SA; Harris GT; Rice ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):485-506. PubMed ID: 17620273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Mental disorder amongst defendants in Liverpool Magistrates' Court.
    Brabbins CJ; Travers RF
    Med Sci Law; 1994 Oct; 34(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 7830509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Reassessing the aftercare treatment of individuals found not guilty due to a mental disability in Hunan, China: supplemental study into the disposition of mentally ill offenders after forensic psychiatric assessment.
    Wang X; Zhang D; Jiang S; Bai Y; Cucolo HE; Perlin ML
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 17464720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The judge's view of competency evaluations. II.
    Owens H; Rosner R; Harmon RB
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 3427240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
    Appelbaum PS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Internationalizing forensic assessments of criminal responsibility.
    Meynen G; Oei K
    Med Law; 2011 Dec; 30(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 22397178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Exploring the origin of sentencing disparities in the Crown Court: Using text mining techniques to differentiate between court and judge disparities.
    Pina-Sánchez J; Grech D; Brunton-Smith I; Sferopoulos D
    Soc Sci Res; 2019 Nov; 84():102343. PubMed ID: 31674336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Use of the Mental Health Act criteria in the decision-making process for compulsory admissions: a study of psychiatrists in South London.
    Dazzan P; Bhugra D
    Med Sci Law; 2000 Oct; 40(4):336-44. PubMed ID: 11281356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Judges', lay judges', and police officers' beliefs about factors affecting children's testimony about sexual abuse.
    Leander L; Christianson SA; Svedin CG; Granhag PA
    J Psychol; 2007 Jul; 141(4):341-57. PubMed ID: 17725070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The forensic psychiatrist of the future.
    Dietz PE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 3676522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Imprisonment for non-intentional transmission of HIV: can it be supported using established principles for justifying criminal sentencing?
    Phillips M; Sukthankar A
    Sex Transm Infect; 2013 Jun; 89(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 23580609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Forensic aspects of alcohol abuse and homicide.
    Palijan TZ; Kovacević D; Radeljak S; Kovac M; Mustapić J
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Sep; 33(3):893-7. PubMed ID: 19860121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A "change-of-standard" perspective on the relations among context, judgment, and memory.
    Higgins ET; Stangor C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Feb; 54(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 3346810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Mens rea ascription, expertise and outcome effects: Professional judges surveyed.
    Kneer M; Bourgeois-Gironde S
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():139-146. PubMed ID: 28889031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications.
    Watamura E; Ioku T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277939. PubMed ID: 36409707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Judges' views on evidence of genetic contributions to mental disorders in court.
    Berryessa CM
    J Forens Psychiatry Psychol; 2016; 27(4):586-600. PubMed ID: 27594808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. On averaging judges' ratings to increase their correlation with an external criterion.
    Horowitz LM; Inouye D; Siegelman EY
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1979 Jun; 47(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 528713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Are algorithms good judges?
    Matacic C
    Science; 2018 Jan; 359(6373):263. PubMed ID: 29348219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.