BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18342299)

  • 21. [Formation of spatial short-term memory in 18-54-month old children].
    Dashniani MG; Chkhikvishvili NTs; Aragveli RI; Noselidze AG; Naneĭshvili TL
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2001; 51(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 11550638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Qualitative differences in the representation of spatial relations for different object classes.
    Cooper EE; Brooks BE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 15053686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Early non-visual experience influences proprioceptive-spatial discrimination acuity in adulthood.
    Fiehler K; Reuschel J; Rösler F
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):897-906. PubMed ID: 19159637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Micro- and macroreference frames: Specifying the relations between spatial categories in memory.
    Greenauer N; Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):938-57. PubMed ID: 20565211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Categorical and coordinate spatial representations within object-location memory.
    van Asselen M; Kessels RP; Kappelle LJ; Postma A
    Cortex; 2008 Mar; 44(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 18387555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space.
    Janzen G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):493-508. PubMed ID: 16627352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Object recognition with severe spatial deficits in Williams syndrome: sparing and breakdown.
    Landau B; Hoffman JE; Kurz N
    Cognition; 2006 Jul; 100(3):483-510. PubMed ID: 16185678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do rats really express neophobia towards novel objects? Experimental evidence from exposure to novelty and to an object recognition task in an open space and an enclosed space.
    Ennaceur A; Michalikova S; Chazot PL
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 197(2):417-34. PubMed ID: 18992282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is a pre-change object representation weakened under correct detection of a change?
    Yeh YY; Yang CT
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 19091601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching.
    Krigolson O; Heath M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2004 Dec; 23(6):861-77. PubMed ID: 15664677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Action comprehension: deriving spatial and functional relations.
    Bach P; Knoblich G; Gunter TC; Friederici AD; Prinz W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):465-79. PubMed ID: 15982126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Toward a definition of intrinsic axes: the effect of orthogonality and symmetry on the preferred direction of spatial memory.
    Richard L; Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1914-29. PubMed ID: 23751008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biased representations of the spatial structure of navigable environments.
    Valiquette CM; McNamara TP; Labrecque JS
    Psychol Res; 2007 May; 71(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 16957954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intrinsic frames of reference in haptic spatial learning.
    Yamamoto N; Philbeck JW
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):447-56. PubMed ID: 24007919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-resolution ERP mapping of cortical activation related to implicit object-location memory.
    Murphy JS; Wynne CE; O'Rourke EM; Commins S; Roche RA
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 19683556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A principal components analysis of dynamic spatial memory biases.
    Motes MA; Hubbard TL; Courtney JR; Rypma B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1076-83. PubMed ID: 18763892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selective sexual orientation-related differences in object location memory.
    Hassan B; Rahman Q
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 121(3):625-33. PubMed ID: 17592955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mental representations of recently learned nested environments.
    Wang Y; Yu X; Dou Y; McNamara TP; Li J
    Psychol Res; 2021 Nov; 85(8):2922-2934. PubMed ID: 33211160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments.
    Kelly JW; Avraamides MN; Loomis JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1092-107. PubMed ID: 17983315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cross-sensory transfer of reference frames in spatial memory.
    Kelly JW; Avraamides MN
    Cognition; 2011 Mar; 118(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 21227408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.