445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18342763)
1. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
Nees AV
Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 18342763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital mammography: novel applications.
Rafferty EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Lewin JM; Niklason L
Semin Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 42(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 17919527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital mammography: an update.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review.
Skaane P
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jan; 50(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19037825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital mammography.
Lewin JM; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE
Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):871-84, vi. PubMed ID: 15337422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.
Helvie MA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):917-29. PubMed ID: 20868894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
Freer PE; Winkler N
Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
Van Ongeval Ch
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast tomosynthesis.
Diekmann F; Bick U
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 21782118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care.
Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 24450669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.
Poplack SP; Tosteson TD; Kogel CA; Nagy HM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 17715109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital mammography, sestamibi breast scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography breast imaging.
Pisano ED; Parham CA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):861-9, x. PubMed ID: 10943283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Dromain C; Balleyguier C; Adler G; Garbay JR; Delaloge S
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 18790584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital mammography: current capabilities and obstacles.
Parikh J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):759-67. PubMed ID: 17411924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital Breast Imaging Workflow.
Odle TG
Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):305M-322M; quiz 323M-326M. PubMed ID: 26721854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of digital breast tomosynthesis with mammography for breast cancer screening or diagnosis.
; ;
Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2014 Jan; 28(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 24730082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Current challenges of full field digital mammography.
Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 16461520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
