90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18342774)
1. Optimization of region of interest luminances may enhance radiologists' light adaptation.
O'Connell NM; Toomey RJ; McEntee M; Ryan J; Stowe J; Adams A; Brennan PC
Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):488-93. PubMed ID: 18342774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of the effect of ambient lighting on contrast sensitivity using a novel method for conducting visual research on LCDS.
Sund P; Båth M; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):62-70. PubMed ID: 20211917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist.
Brennan PC; McEntee M; Evanoff M; Phillips P; O'Connor WT; Manning DJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):W177-80. PubMed ID: 17242225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detectability decreases with off-normal viewing in medical liquid crystal displays.
Badano A; Gallas BD
Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 16428057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of different review displays with respect to the detection of low-contrast details in digital radiographs].
Wirth S; Schöfer H; Kotsianos-Hermle D; Körner M; Lucke A; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M; Treitl M
Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):698-705. PubMed ID: 16817123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image browsing in slow medical liquid crystal displays.
Liang H; Park S; Gallas BD; Myers KJ; Badano A
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 18280935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of increased ambient lighting on mass detection in mammograms.
Pollard BJ; Samei E; Chawla AS; Baker J; Ghate S; Kim C; Soo MS; Hashimoto N
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 19201358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the age of liquid crystal displays influence observer performance?
Krupinski EA; Roehrig H; Fan J
Acad Radiol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 17368216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of acoustic noise found within clinical departments on radiology performance.
Brennan PC; Ryan J; Evanoff M; Toomey R; O'Beirne A; Manning D; Chakraborty DP; McEntee M
Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 18342772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of ultrasound monitor image display performance.
Moore SC; Munnings CR; Brettle DS; Evans JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):971-9. PubMed ID: 21601138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of image quality and arterial enhancement with a dedicated coronary CTA protocol versus a triple rule-out coronary CTA protocol.
Halpern EJ; Levin DC; Zhang S; Takakuwa KM
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1039-48. PubMed ID: 19523852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast enhancement in chest multidetector computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of 300 mg/ml versus 400 mg/ml iodinated contrast medium.
Behrendt FF; Plumhans C; Keil S; Mühlenbruch G; Das M; Seidensticker P; Mutscher C; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 19124099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ambient illumination revisited: a new adaptation-based approach for optimizing medical imaging reading environments.
Chawla AS; Samei E
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 17278493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prototype system for enhancement of frontal chest radiographs using eigenimage processing.
Butler A; Bones P; Hurrell M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Jun; 52(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 18477119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. View box luminance measurements and their effect on reader performance.
Rill LN; Huda W; Gkanatsios NA
Acad Radiol; 1999 Sep; 6(9):521-9. PubMed ID: 10894060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring observer performance in chest radiology: some experiences.
Potchen EJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 17412097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of common large sellar-suprasellar masses effect of artificial neural network on radiologists' diagnosis performance.
Kitajima M; Hirai T; Katsuragawa S; Okuda T; Fukuoka H; Sasao A; Akter M; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Ikeda R; Yamashita Y; Yano S; Kuratsu J; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 19201360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: effect of ambient light and automatic optimization of monitor luminance.
Uffmann M; Prokop M; Kupper W; Mang T; Fiedler V; Schaefer-Prokop C
Invest Radiol; 2005 Mar; 40(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 15714093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
