BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18343428)

  • 1. Does obesity impact the costs of partial and radical nephrectomy?
    Bensalah K; Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Marvin A; Lotan Y
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1714-7; discussion 1717-8. PubMed ID: 18343428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obesity and morbid obesity are associated with a greater conversion rate to open surgery for standard but not hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Gabr AH; Elsayed ER; Gdor Y; Roberts WW; Wolf JS
    J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2357-62; discussion 2362. PubMed ID: 18930284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of open and laparoscopic nephrectomy in obese and nonobese patients: outcomes stratified by body mass index.
    Feder MT; Patel MB; Melman A; Ghavamian R; Hoenig DM
    J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 18485408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy.
    Delaney CP; Pokala N; Senagore AJ; Casillas S; Kiran RP; Brady KM; Fazio VW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 May; 48(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 15793638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of impact of body mass index on outcomes of laparoscopic renal surgery.
    Gong EM; Orvieto MA; Lyon MB; Lucioni A; Gerber GS; Shalhav AL
    Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17270610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of costs and morbidity associated with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating small renal tumours.
    Bensalah K; Zeltser I; Tuncel A; Cadeddu J; Lotan Y
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 17922853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: outcomes and technical considerations.
    Fugita OE; Chan DY; Roberts WW; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):247-52; discussion 252. PubMed ID: 14972463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative financial analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for small renal tumours < or =3.5 cm: a single institutional experience.
    Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Robertson C; Albala D; Walther P; Polascik TJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):715-20; discussion 720-1. PubMed ID: 16904255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cost comparison of nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal tumour.
    Lotan Y; Cadeddu JA
    BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1039-42. PubMed ID: 15839927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefit of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in high body mass index patients.
    Kaneko G; Miyajima A; Kikuchi E; Nakagawa K; Oya M
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jul; 42(7):619-24. PubMed ID: 22561514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in obese patients.
    Colombo JR; Haber GP; Aron M; Xu M; Gill IS
    Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 17270611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of body mass index on cost and clinical outcomes after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.
    Bagrodia A; Gupta A; Raman JD; Bensalah K; Pearle MS; Lotan Y
    Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):756-60. PubMed ID: 18718645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost trends for oncological renal surgery: support for a laparoscopic standard of care.
    Hollingsworth JM; Miller DC; Dunn RL; Montgomery JS; Wolf JS
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1097-101; discussion 1101. PubMed ID: 16890699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy.
    Isac WE; Autorino R; Hillyer SP; Hernandez AV; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E997-E1002. PubMed ID: 23106799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of body mass index on clinical and cost outcomes after radical cystectomy.
    Bagrodia A; Grover S; Srivastava A; Gupta A; Bolenz C; Sagalowsky AI; Lotan Y
    BJU Int; 2009 Aug; 104(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19220244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits of laparoscopy in middle-aged patients.
    Lagares-Garcia JA; Bansidhar B; Moore RA
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jan; 17(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 12360377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider.
    Senagore AJ; Brannigan A; Kiran RP; Brady K; Delaney CP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 May; 48(5):1016-20. PubMed ID: 15785881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy.
    Hamidi V; Andersen MH; Oyen O; Mathisen L; Fosse E; Kristiansen IS
    Transplantation; 2009 Mar; 87(6):831-8. PubMed ID: 19300185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in the extremely obese patient.
    Berglund RK; Gill IS; Babineau D; Desai M; Kaouk JH
    BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):871-4. PubMed ID: 17233808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses.
    Castle SM; Gorbatiy V; Avallone MA; Eldefrawy A; Caulton DE; Leveillee RJ
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1327-32. PubMed ID: 22361086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.