172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18344277)
1. A dosimetric comparison between two intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques: tomotherapy vs dynamic linear accelerator.
Whitelaw GL; Blasiak-Wal I; Cooke K; Usher C; Macdougall ND; Plowman PN
Br J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 81(964):333-40. PubMed ID: 18344277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A planning comparison of dynamic IMRT for different collimator leaf thicknesses with helical tomotherapy and RapidArc for prostate and head and neck tumors.
Jacob V; Bayer W; Astner ST; Busch R; Kneschaurek P
Strahlenther Onkol; 2010 Sep; 186(9):502-10. PubMed ID: 20803184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dosimetric analysis comparing treatment of low-risk prostate cancer with TomoTherapy versus static field intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Shah AP; Chen SS; Strauss JB; Kirk MC; Coleman JL; Coon AB; Miller C; Dickler A
Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 32(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 19564784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A quantitative study of IMRT delivery effects in commercial planning systems for the case of oesophagus and prostate tumours.
Seco J; Clark CH; Evans PM; Webb S
Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):401-8. PubMed ID: 16632620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dosimetric comparison of non-coplanar IMRT versus Helical Tomotherapy for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Read PW
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 17275112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indications for tomotherapy/intensity-modulated radiation therapy in paediatric radiotherapy: extracranial disease.
Plowman PN; Cooke K; Walsh N
Br J Radiol; 2008 Nov; 81(971):872-80. PubMed ID: 18941047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dependence of achievable plan quality on treatment technique and planning goal refinement: a head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy application.
Qi XS; Ruan D; Lee SP; Pham A; Kupelian P; Low DA; Steinberg M; Demarco J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 25752396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index.
Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sparing the penile bulb in the radical irradiation of clinically localised prostate carcinoma: A comparison between MRI and CT prostatic apex definition in 3DCRT, Linac-IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy.
Perna L; Fiorino C; Cozzarini C; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; De Cobelli F; Mangili P; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 19410316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conversion of the helical tomotherapy plans to the step-and-shoot IMRT plans for patients with hip prosthesis during radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Olmińska M; Piotrowski T; Litoborska J; Pawałowski B; Jodda A
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 26674461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Cao D; Holmes TW; Afghan MK; Shepard DM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 17707278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose-volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays.
Hayashi A; Shibamoto Y; Hattori Y; Tamura T; Iwabuchi M; Otsuka S; Sugie C; Yanagi T
J Radiat Res; 2015 Mar; 56(2):338-45. PubMed ID: 25609741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric effects of rotational output variation and x-ray target degradation on helical tomotherapy plans.
Staton RJ; Langen KM; Kupelian PA; Meeks SL
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2881-8. PubMed ID: 19673187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases.
Zhang P; Happersett L; Hunt M; Jackson A; Zelefsky M; Mageras G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1456-62. PubMed ID: 19540062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
