These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18344496)

  • 1. Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition.
    Haddock G; Maio GR; Arnold K; Huskinson T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 18344496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion.
    Kao DT
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 21752025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: need for cognition determines the impact of message format.
    Bakker AB
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1999 Apr; 11(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 10214498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changing exercise through targeting affective or cognitive attitudes.
    Conner M; Rhodes RE; Morris B; McEachan R; Lawton R
    Psychol Health; 2011 Feb; 26(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 21318926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in drivers' cognitive processing of road safety messages.
    Kaye SA; White MJ; Lewis IM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():272-81. PubMed ID: 22608267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion.
    See YH; Petty RE; Fabrigar LR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Jun; 94(6):938-55. PubMed ID: 18505310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Affective synchrony: individual differences in mixed emotions.
    Rafaeli E; Rogers GM; Revelle W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jul; 33(7):915-32. PubMed ID: 17551163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disengagement beliefs in smokers: do they influence the effects of a tailored persuasive message advocating smoking cessation?
    Dijkstra A
    Psychol Health; 2009 Sep; 24(7):791-804. PubMed ID: 20205027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive and affective matching effects in persuasion: an amplification perspective.
    Clarkson JJ; Tormala ZL; Rucker DD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1415-27. PubMed ID: 21734162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of different positive emotions on persuasion processing: a functional evolutionary approach.
    Griskevicius V; Shiota MN; Neufeld SL
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):190-206. PubMed ID: 20364895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-guide framing and persuasion: responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels.
    Evans LM; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15273009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The perceived informational basis of attitudes: implications for subjective ambivalence.
    Tormala ZL; DeSensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Feb; 34(2):275-87. PubMed ID: 18212335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social vigilantism: measuring individual differences in belief superiority and resistance to persuasion.
    Saucier DA; Webster RJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jan; 36(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 19776422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking.
    Shen L
    Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20390667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Valle C; Rucker DD; Becerra A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Dec; 93(6):1040-53. PubMed ID: 18072853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assimilation and contrast in persuasion: the effects of source credibility in multiple message situations.
    Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Apr; 33(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 17363764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistance to persuasion and attitude certainty: the moderating role of elaboration.
    Tormala ZL; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1446-57. PubMed ID: 15448308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Promoting health or promoting pleasure? A contingency approach to the effect of informational and emotional appeals on food liking and consumption.
    Dubé L; Cantin I
    Appetite; 2000 Dec; 35(3):251-62. PubMed ID: 11073707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The best way to tell you to use a condom: the interplay between message format and individuals' level of need for cognition.
    Carnaghi A; Cadinu M; Castelli L; Kiesner J; Bragantini C
    AIDS Care; 2007 Mar; 19(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 17453580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Think" versus "feel" framing effects in persuasion.
    Mayer ND; Tormala ZL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Apr; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 20363901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.