These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18344496)

  • 21. Sense or sensibility? The neuro-functional basis of the structural matching effect in persuasion.
    Aquino A; Alparone FR; Pagliaro S; Haddock G; Maio GR; Perrucci MG; Ebisch SJH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 20(3):536-550. PubMed ID: 32185623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages.
    Das EH; de Wit JB; Stroebe W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 May; 29(5):650-64. PubMed ID: 15272997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Resisting persuasion by illegitimate means: a metacognitive perspective on minority influence.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Mar; 33(3):354-67. PubMed ID: 17312317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of affective and cognitive arguments on message judgement and attitude change: The moderating effects of meta-bases and structural bases.
    Keer M; van den Putte B; Neijens P; de Wit J
    Psychol Health; 2013; 28(8):895-908. PubMed ID: 23421971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Barden J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Nov; 93(5):711-27. PubMed ID: 17983296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies.
    DeSteno D; Petty RE; Rucker DD; Wegener DT; Braverman J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jan; 86(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 14717627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mood and multiple source characteristics: mood congruency of source consensus status and source trustworthiness as determinants of message scrutiny.
    Ziegler R; Diehl M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1016-30. PubMed ID: 21632961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictors and the role of attitude toward the message and perceived message quality in gain- and loss-frame antidrug persuasion of adolescents.
    Cho H; Choi J
    Health Commun; 2010 Jun; 25(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 20512712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Incidental experiences of affective coherence and incoherence influence persuasion.
    Huntsinger JR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jun; 39(6):792-802. PubMed ID: 23542415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Promoting exercise behaviour: an integration of persuasion theories and the theory of planned behaviour.
    Jones LW; Sinclair RC; Rhodes RE; Courneya KS
    Br J Health Psychol; 2004 Nov; 9(Pt 4):505-21. PubMed ID: 15509358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Resisting persuasion by the skin of one's teeth: the hidden success of resisted persuasive messages.
    Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(3):423-35. PubMed ID: 16938028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Resistance can be good or bad: how theories of resistance and dissonance affect attitude certainty.
    Rydell RJ; Hugenberg K; McConnell AR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jun; 32(6):740-50. PubMed ID: 16648199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Temporal framing and persuasion to adopt preventive health behavior: moderating effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on sunscreen use.
    Orbell S; Kyriakaki M
    Health Psychol; 2008 Nov; 27(6):770-9. PubMed ID: 19025273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of suspicion on willingness to engage in systematic processing of persuasive arguments.
    Echebarria-Echabe A
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):148-59. PubMed ID: 20397591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Avoidance orientation moderates the effect of threatening messages.
    van 't Riet J; Ruiter RA; de Vries H
    J Health Psychol; 2012 Jan; 17(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 21708867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Success in chess mediated by mental molds.
    Hernández Hernández P; Rodríguez Mateo H
    Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):704-10. PubMed ID: 17296106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Personality, threat, and cognitive and emotional reactions to stressful intercultural situations.
    van der zee K; van Oudenhoven JP; de Grijs E
    J Pers; 2004 Oct; 72(5):1069-96. PubMed ID: 15335337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Emotion and persuasion: cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes.
    Petty RE; Briñol P
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 25302943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion.
    Lee AY; Aaker JL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 14769079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.