358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18344757)
1. A comparison among Humphrey field analyzer, Microperimetry, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in the evaluation of macula in primary open angle glaucoma.
Oztürk F; Yavas GF; Küsbeci T; Ermis SS
J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 18344757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness values using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-III.
Moreno-Montañés J; Antón A; García N; Olmo N; Morilla A; Fallon M
J Glaucoma; 2009 Sep; 18(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 19745667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Macular area in glaucoma patients].
Hrncírová K; Hornová J; Cihelková I
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2006 May; 62(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 16758763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Frequency-doubling perimetry in examination of open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defect].
Wu L; Suzuki Y; Kunimatsu S; Araie M; Yao K
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 38(12):717-20. PubMed ID: 12654219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of macular thickness measurements for detection of band atrophy of the optic nerve using optical coherence tomography.
Moura FC; Medeiros FA; Monteiro ML
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 17070583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between discriminant analysis models and "glaucoma probability score" for the detection of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes.
Iester M; Perdicchi A; Capris E; Siniscalco A; Calabria G; Recupero SM
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 18854729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.
Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Kim J; Seiple W; Rosen RB; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 19692366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT 2) parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle closure glaucoma: a comparative study in an Indian population.
Thomas R; Muliyil J; Simha R A; Parikh RS
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 13(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 17060113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT).
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Nikkhou K; Hoffman DC; Law SK; Caprioli J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18414102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the ISNT rule violated in early primary open-angle glaucoma--a scanning laser tomography study.
Sihota R; Srinivasan G; Dada T; Gupta V; Ghate D; Sharma A
Eye (Lond); 2008 Jun; 22(6):819-24. PubMed ID: 17435693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph, optical coherence tomograph, and scanning laser polarimeter in open-angle glaucoma.
Pueyo V; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007 Mar; 16(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 17473725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glaucoma probability score vs Moorfields classification in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes.
Moreno-Montañés J; Antón A; García N; Mendiluce L; Ayala E; Sebastián A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):360-368. PubMed ID: 18045569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The correlation between visual field defects and focal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with optical coherence tomography in the evaluation of glaucoma.
Yalvac IS; Altunsoy M; Cansever S; Satana B; Eksioglu U; Duman S
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 19142136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Parisi V; Miglior S; Manni G; Centofanti M; Bucci MG
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 16406535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]