585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18344863)
1. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.
Kuklo TR; Potter BK; O'Brien MF; Schroeder TM; Lenke LG; Polly DW;
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Apr; 18(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 15800433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Schroeder TM; O'Brien MF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(11):1240-6. PubMed ID: 16688038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs.
Zmurko MG; Mooney JF; Podeszwa DA; Minster GJ; Mendelow MJ; Guirgues A
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2003; 12(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 15008284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis.
Aubin CE; Bellefleur C; Joncas J; de Lanauze D; Kadoury S; Blanke K; Parent S; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(12):E780-90. PubMed ID: 21224755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of digital radiographs for pediatric lower extremity alignment.
Nowicki PD; Vanderhave KL; Farley FA; Kuhns LR; Dahl W; Caird MS
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32(6):631-5. PubMed ID: 22892628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles.
Hardesty CK; Aronson J; Aronson EA; Ranade AS; McCracken CW; Nick TG; Cordell CL
J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Mar; 33(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 23389571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.
Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Polly DW; O'Brien MF; Schroeder TM; Lenke LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 15706343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis.
Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR
J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems for idiopathic scoliosis].
Sheng WB; Zheng XF; Guo HL; Zhan YL; Mai ED; Jin GL; Pu LT; Sheng J; Deng Q
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 89(15):1047-52. PubMed ID: 19595255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs.
Lee MC; Solomito M; Patel A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):E656-61. PubMed ID: 23429689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
