These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18345104)

  • 1. Model for quantifying photoelastic fringe degradation by imperfect retroreflective backings.
    Woolard D; Hinders M
    Appl Opt; 2000 May; 39(13):2043-53. PubMed ID: 18345104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of principal component analysis in phase-shifting photoelasticity.
    Quiroga JA; Gómez-Pedrero JA
    Opt Express; 2016 Mar; 24(6):5984-95. PubMed ID: 27136792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fringe patterns in integrated photoelasticity.
    Ainola L; Aben H
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2009 Jul; 26(7):1714-20. PubMed ID: 19568308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
    Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative Characterization of the Anisotropy of the Stress-Optical Properties of Polyethylene Terephthalate Films Based on the Photoelastic Method.
    He Q; Wang M; Du Y; Qin Q; Qiu W
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Aug; 14(16):. PubMed ID: 36015516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fringe pattern analysis to evaluate light sources and sensors in digital photoelasticity.
    Fandiño-Toro H; Aristizábal-López Y; Restrepo-Martínez A; Briñez-de León J
    Appl Opt; 2023 Apr; 62(10):2560-2568. PubMed ID: 37132804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic Photoelasticity Using LED and Polaroid Film.
    Asundi A; Sajan MR
    Appl Opt; 1995 Dec; 34(34):8064-5. PubMed ID: 21068911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metrological study for the optimal selection of the photoelastic model in transmission photoelasticity.
    Fernández MS
    Appl Opt; 2011 Oct; 50(29):5721-7. PubMed ID: 22015367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple LED camera for dynamic photoelasticity.
    Asundi A; Sajan MR
    Appl Opt; 1995 May; 34(13):2236-40. PubMed ID: 21037772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Direct Approach to In-Plane Stress Separation using Photoelastic Ptychography.
    Anthony N; Cadenazzi G; Kirkwood H; Huwald E; Nugent K; Abbey B
    Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():30541. PubMed ID: 27488605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of the harmonic star method in photoelastic separation of principal stresses.
    Ostertag O; Frankovský P; Ostertagová E; Trebuňa F
    Appl Opt; 2016 Jan; 55(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 26835913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phase measuring algorithm for extraction of isochromatics of photoelastic fringe patterns.
    Quiroga JA; González-Cano A
    Appl Opt; 1997 Nov; 36(32):8397-402. PubMed ID: 18264382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isochromatic fringes in photoelasticity.
    Aben H; Ainola L
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 Apr; 17(4):750-5. PubMed ID: 10757183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple-reflection effects in photoelastic stress analysis.
    Bhowmik AK
    Appl Opt; 2001 Jun; 40(16):2687-91. PubMed ID: 18357285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the optical theory of photoelastic tomography.
    Ainola L; Aben H
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Jun; 21(6):1093-101. PubMed ID: 15191193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the correlation of photoelasticity and digital imaging to characterize the load transfer of implant-supported restorations.
    Tiossi R; de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; Conrad HJ; de Mattos Mda G; Fok AS; Ribeiro RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 24461947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress distribution of different implant connections associated with multiple implant-supported prostheses.
    Goiato MC; Sarauza Arsufi G; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; da Silva EVF; Sonego MV; Dos Santos DM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-367. PubMed ID: 30251571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrated photoelasticity through imaging fourier polarimetry of an elliptic retarder.
    Berezhna S; Berezhnyy I; Takashi M
    Appl Opt; 2001 Feb; 40(5):644-51. PubMed ID: 18357041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Photoelasticity in dentistry. 2. Influence of the supporting apical base].
    Campos Júnior A; Passanezi E; Nahás D; Chiapinotto GA; Lopes ES
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 2490985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of photoelastic strain measurement on cadaveric proximal femora.
    Glisson RR; Musgrave DS; Graham RD; Vail TP
    J Biomech Eng; 2000 Aug; 122(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 11036567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.