These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18345104)

  • 21. Spectropolarimetric measurement based on a fast-axis-adjustable photoelastic modulator.
    Zhang R; Wang Z; Li K; Chen Y; Jing N; Qiao Y; Xie K
    Appl Opt; 2019 Jan; 58(2):325-332. PubMed ID: 30645310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design, characterization, and fabrication of 90-degree viewing angle catadioptric retroreflector floating device using in 3D floating light-field display system.
    Gao C; Sang X; Yu X; Gao X; Du J; Liu B; Liu L; Wang P
    Opt Express; 2020 Aug; 28(17):24854-24873. PubMed ID: 32907017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stress distribution after installation of fixed frameworks with marginal gaps over angled and parallel implants: a photoelastic analysis.
    Markarian RA; Ueda C; Sendyk CL; Laganá DC; Souza RM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 17362421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measurement of surface form error of an optical surface with reduced interferometric spatial coherence artifacts using a ring source and polarization phase-shifting interferometry.
    Pavan Kumar Y; Negi SS; Kamath MP; Chatterjee S; Sharma SD
    Appl Opt; 2016 Dec; 55(35):10053-10059. PubMed ID: 27958420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the photoelastic stress properties for two combination prefabricated cast post systems.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo M; Condos S; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Oral Health; 1995 Aug; 85(8):41-4, 46. PubMed ID: 8779735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in different retention systems for facial prosthesis.
    Goiato MC; Ribeiro Pdo P; Pellizzer EP; Garcia Júnior IR; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):757-61. PubMed ID: 19381103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Principal formulas of integrated photoelasticity in terms of characteristic parameters.
    Ainola L; Aben H
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Jun; 22(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 15984493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical effects of splint types on traumatized tooth: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Burcak Cengiz S; Stephan Atac A; Cehreli ZC
    Dent Traumatol; 2006 Jun; 22(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16643288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Accuracy analysis on a sort of polarized measurement in remote sensing].
    Chen LG; Hong J; Qiao YL; Sun XB; Wang YJ
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2008 Oct; 28(10):2384-7. PubMed ID: 19123412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A photoelastic stress analysis of screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses with marginal gaps.
    Lee JI; Lee Y; Kim NY; Kim YL; Cho HW
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):735-49. PubMed ID: 23927066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Simple Color Calibration Method by Projection onto Retroreflective Materials.
    Nakamura Y; Horiuchi T
    J Imaging; 2022 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 36135405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accurate determination of fractional retardations in photoelasticity through digital fringe multiplication.
    Swain D; Thomas BP; Selvan SK; Philip J
    Appl Opt; 2021 Nov; 60(33):10343-10353. PubMed ID: 34807042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Photoelastic illumination by using cathode-ray-tube displays.
    Ng TW; Sajan MR; Asundi A
    Appl Opt; 1997 Jun; 36(16):3601-3. PubMed ID: 18253380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phase errors due to speckles in laser fringe projection.
    Rosendahl S; Hällstig E; Gren P; Sjödahl M
    Appl Opt; 2010 Apr; 49(11):2047-53. PubMed ID: 20390003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accurate polarization measurements with a dual photoelastic modulator.
    Kuldkepp M; Hawkes NC; Rachlew E; Schunke B
    Appl Opt; 2005 Oct; 44(28):5899-904. PubMed ID: 16231796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system.
    Clelland NL; Gilat A; McGlumphy EA; Brantley WA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 8112794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short wavelength far infrared laser polarimeter with silicon photoelastic modulators.
    Akiyama T; Kawahata K; Tanaka K; Okajima S; Nakayama K
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Oct; 79(10):10E720. PubMed ID: 19044537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Extension and Limits of Depolarization-Fringe Contrast Roughness Method in Sub-Micron Domain.
    Pöller F; Salazar Bloise F; Jakobi M; Dong J; Koch AW
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34451014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Far-field diffraction pattern of a nonideal retroreflector for polarized light with an oblique incidence.
    Hui Z; Song L; Wenhao Z; Yuwei C
    Appl Opt; 2020 Mar; 59(8):2621-2631. PubMed ID: 32225807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.