161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18345854)
1. Selectivity of modulation interference for consonant identification in normal-hearing listeners.
Apoux F; Bacon SP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1665-72. PubMed ID: 18345854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.
Füllgrabe C; Berthommier F; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):74-84. PubMed ID: 16289579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of envelope-expanded sentences in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Apoux F; Tribut N; Debruille X; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2004 Mar; 189(1-2):13-24. PubMed ID: 14987748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
Lorenzi C; Husson M; Ardoint M; Debruille X
Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the effect on consonant discrimination of combining low- and high-frequency passbands in normal, congenital, and adventitious hearing-impaired subjects.
Franklin B
J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):168-76. PubMed ID: 528295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cantonese tone recognition with enhanced temporal periodicity cues.
Yuan M; Lee T; Yuen KC; Soli SD; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 19603889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of temporal fine-structure cues in speech with minimal envelope cues for listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
Ardoint M; Sheft S; Fleuriot P; Garnier S; Lorenzi C
Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):823-31. PubMed ID: 20666687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined effects of frequency compression-expansion and shift on speech recognition.
Başkent D; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):277-89. PubMed ID: 17485977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
Xu L; Zheng Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modulation transfer functions: a comparison of the results of three methods.
Scott DM; Humes LE
J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 2359280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
