411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18346062)
1. Using evidence in pain practice: Part I: Assessing quality of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
Chou R
Pain Med; 2008; 9(5):518-30. PubMed ID: 18346062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
Chou R
Pain Med; 2008; 9(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 18346061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine and the challenge of low back pain: where are we now?
Chou R
Pain Pract; 2005 Sep; 5(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 17147579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interventions for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Are Practice Guidelines Based on Systematic Reviews?
Lindsley K; Li T; Ssemanda E; Virgili G; Dickersin K
Ophthalmology; 2016 Apr; 123(4):884-97. PubMed ID: 26804762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol.
Johnston BC; Alonso-Coello P; Bala MM; Zeraatkar D; Rabassa M; Valli C; Marshall C; El Dib R; Vernooij RWM; Vandvik PO; Guyatt GH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):162. PubMed ID: 30518328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Over half of clinical practice guidelines use non-systematic methods to inform recommendations: A methods study.
Lunny C; Ramasubbu C; Puil L; Liu T; Gerrish S; Salzwedel DM; Mintzes B; Wright JM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250356. PubMed ID: 33886670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.
Horvath AR; Pewsner D
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Apr; 342(1-2):23-39. PubMed ID: 15026264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 3: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Manchikanti L; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(1):35-72. PubMed ID: 19165297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical practice guidelines versus systematic reviews; which serve as the best basis for evidence-based spine medicine?
Freeman MD
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):512-3. PubMed ID: 20494813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Updating contextualized clinical practice guidelines on stroke rehabilitation and low back pain management using a novel assessment framework that standardizes decisions.
Gambito ED; Gonzalez-Suarez CB; Grimmer KA; Valdecañas CM; Dizon JM; Beredo ME; Zamora MT
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Nov; 8():643. PubMed ID: 26537008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptation, evaluation, and updating of guidelines: article 14 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
Burgers JS; Anzueto A; Black PN; Cruz AA; Fervers B; Graham ID; Metersky M; Woodhead M; Yawn BP;
Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):304-10. PubMed ID: 23256175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
Guyatt G; Akl EA; Oxman A; Wilson K; Puhan MA; Wilt T; Gutterman D; Woodhead M; Antman EM; Schünemann HJ;
Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 23256168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A nephrology guide to reading and using systematic reviews of randomized trials.
Badve SV; Palmer SC; Johnson DW; Strippoli GF
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Jun; 30(6):878-84. PubMed ID: 24957810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Yuan Y; Hunt RH
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1086-92. PubMed ID: 19417748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deciding what type of evidence and outcomes to include in guidelines: article 5 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
Wilt TJ; Guyatt G; Kunz R; Macnee W; Puhan MA; Viegi G; Woodhead M; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ;
Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):243-50. PubMed ID: 23256166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
