163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18347180)
21. Consistency of phase III clinical trial abstracts presented at an annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology compared with their subsequent full-text publications.
Tam VC; Hotte SJ
J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(13):2205-11. PubMed ID: 18445846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Continuous quality improvement applied to a scientific assembly: the history of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
Schwartz RJ; Jacobs LM; Gabram SG; Bennett-Jacobs B
J Trauma; 1993 Oct; 35(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 8411277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting.
Harris IA; Mourad MS; Kadir A; Solomon MJ; Young JM
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 16768761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving the quality of abstract reporting for economic analyses in oncology.
Ho MY; Chan KK; Peacock S; Cheung WY
Curr Oncol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):e428-35. PubMed ID: 23300367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of abstracts submitted to the annual scientific meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.
Bydder S; Marion K; Taylor M; Semmens J
Australas Radiol; 2006 Aug; 50(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 16884423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Peer review in publication: factors associated with the full-length publication of studies presented in abstract form at the annual meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
Greenberg D; Wacht O; Pliskin JS
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):938-42. PubMed ID: 19015283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Statistical power of negative randomized controlled trials presented at American Society for Clinical Oncology annual meetings.
Bedard PL; Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Tannock IF
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(23):3482-7. PubMed ID: 17687153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of industry sponsorship on the acceptance of abstracts and their publication.
McLennan M; Leong FC; Steele A; Harris J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 198(5):579.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18455539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are all abstracts created equal??
Weinert C
Appl Nurs Res; 2010 May; 23(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 20420998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reporting quality of abstracts presented at the European Association of Urology meeting: a critical assessment.
De Sio M; Yakoubi R; De Nunzio C; Damiano R; Balsamo R; Di Palma C; Cantiello F; Azzarito G; Mirone V; Tubaro A; Autorino R
J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1883-6. PubMed ID: 22999688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A statistical analysis of reviewer agreement and bias in evaluating medical abstracts.
Cicchetti DV; Conn HO
Yale J Biol Med; 1976 Sep; 49(4):373-83. PubMed ID: 997596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Publication rate for oral presentations made at the Journées Dermatologiques de Paris meeting].
Bolac C; Orosco A; Guillet G; Quist D; Derancourt C
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Jan; 136(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 19171225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does presentation at the Registrars' Papers Day predict future publication?
Wong SW; Crowe PJ
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):522-5. PubMed ID: 16768782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Discrepancies and rates of publication in orthopaedic sports medicine abstracts.
Kleweno CP; Bryant WK; Jacir AM; Levine WN; Ahmad CS
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):1875-9. PubMed ID: 18667625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting presentations: what gets published and why?
Gilbert WM; Pitkin RM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 15295341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Research & writing basics: elements of the abstract.
Krasner D; Van Rijswijk L
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):14, 16-7. PubMed ID: 7546111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement on minimum standards and exemplary attributes of clinical trial sites.
Zon R; Meropol NJ; Catalano RB; Schilsky RL
J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(15):2562-7. PubMed ID: 18390967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
