245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18347443)
1. Lax sphygmomanometer standard causes overdetection and underdetection of hypertension: a computer simulation study.
Turner MJ; van Schalkwyk JM; Irwig L
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Apr; 13(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 18347443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of sphygmomanometer calibration causes over- and under-detection of hypertension: a computer simulation study.
Turner MJ; Irwig L; Bune AJ; Kam PC; Baker AB
J Hypertens; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1931-8. PubMed ID: 16957551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sphygmomanometer calibration--why, how and how often?
Turner MJ; Speechly C; Bignell N
Aust Fam Physician; 2007 Oct; 36(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 17925905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Oscillometric wrist devices: comparison with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer and estimate of the "supine" error].
Caridi G; Zoccali C; Enia G
G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 14732910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-measurement of blood pressure: validation of the Braun BP VitalScan Plus 1650 monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
Nolly H; Osso P; Nolly A; Silva M; Nolly M; Romero M
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Apr; 13(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 18347444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor and an EasyClick cuff according to the International Protocol in adults.
Ilman N; Altunkan S; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 17303987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The extent and implications of sphygmomanometer calibration error in primary care.
Rouse A; Marshall T
J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Sep; 15(9):587-91. PubMed ID: 11550103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of the automatic sphygmo-oscillographic and auscultation methods of blood pressure measurements].
Sapiński A; Swidzińska S; Sapiński F
Kardiol Pol; 1991; 34(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 2051710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trial of validation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol: the Citizen CH-432B and the Citizen CH-656C.
Cotte UV; Faltenbacher VH; von Willich W; Bogner JR
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18199925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blood pressure determination by traditionally trained personnel is less reliable and tends to underestimate the severity of moderate to severe hypertension.
Roubsanthisuk W; Wongsurin U; Saravich S; Buranakitjaroen P
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 17353647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New clinical validation method for automated sphygmomanometer: a proposal by Japan ISO-WG for sphygmomanometer standard.
Shirasaki O; Asou Y; Takahashi Y
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 18277315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of blood pressure of adults depending on method of measurement].
Wielemborek-Musiał K; Jegier A
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2006 Jun; 115(6):529-34. PubMed ID: 17263224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Definition of hypertension: the impact of number of visits for blood pressure measurement.
Figueiredo D; Azevedo A; Pereira M; de Barros H
Rev Port Cardiol; 2009; 28(7-8):775-83. PubMed ID: 19894656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
