These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1834786)

  • 1. Individual differences in Stroop dilution: tests of the attention-capture hypothesis.
    Yee PL; Hunt E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):715-25. PubMed ID: 1834786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
    Lindsay DS; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.
    Kahneman D; Chajczyk D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):497-509. PubMed ID: 6224888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpreting Stroop interference: an analysis of differences between task versions.
    Salo R; Henik A; Robertson LC
    Neuropsychology; 2001 Oct; 15(4):462-71. PubMed ID: 11761035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.
    Graf P; Uttl B; Tuokko H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):390-415. PubMed ID: 7650102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Color priming affects Stroop interference.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 6866673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of color word availability on the Stroop color-naming effect.
    Kim H; Cho YS; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1540-51. PubMed ID: 19064496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation.
    MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 9584429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.
    Roelofs A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.
    Glaser WR; Glaser MO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):13-42. PubMed ID: 2522504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task set persistence modulates word reading following resolution of picture-word interference.
    Masson ME; Bub DN; Ishigami Y
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2012-8. PubMed ID: 18265616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 15945205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emotional Stroop Dilution: The boundary conditions of attentional capture by threat words.
    Reynolds MG; Langerak RM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():108-15. PubMed ID: 26093219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.