141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1834788)
1. Percepts of rigid motion within and across apertures.
Shiffrar M; Pavel M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):749-61. PubMed ID: 1834788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The perception of biological motion across apertures.
Shiffrar M; Lichtey L; Heptulla Chatterjee S
Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 9038407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial gating effects on judged motion of gratings in apertures.
Power RP; Moulden B
Perception; 1992; 21(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 1437464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The bar-cross-ellipse illusion: alternating percepts of rigid and nonrigid motion based on contour ownership and trackable feature assignment.
Caplovitz GP; Tse PU
Perception; 2006; 35(7):993-7. PubMed ID: 16970207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pattern cues disambiguate perceived direction in simple moving stimuli.
Badcock DR; McKendrick AM; Ma-Wyatt A
Vision Res; 2003 Oct; 43(22):2291-301. PubMed ID: 12962987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multiview displays.
Liter JC; Braunstein ML; Hoffman DD
Perception; 1993; 22(12):1441-65. PubMed ID: 8090621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: minimum points and views.
Braunstein ML; Hoffman DD; Pollick FE
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 2326144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Drifting Edge Illusion: a stationary edge abutting an oriented drifting grating appears to move because of the 'other aperture problem'.
Caplovitz GP; Paymer NA; Tse PU
Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2403-14. PubMed ID: 18694778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The directional tuning of the barber-pole illusion.
Fisher N; Zanker JM
Perception; 2001; 30(11):1321-36. PubMed ID: 11768487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Solving occlusion indeterminacy in chromatically homogeneous patterns.
Tommasi L; Bressan P; Vallortigara G
Perception; 1995; 24(4):391-403. PubMed ID: 7675619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cyclopean (stereoscopic) barber pole illusion.
Patterson R; Bowd C; Donnelly M
Vision Res; 1998 Jul; 38(14):2119-25. PubMed ID: 9797972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limits on the comprehension of rotational motion: mental imagery of rotations with oblique components.
Pani JR
Perception; 1993; 22(7):785-808. PubMed ID: 8115237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion.
Todd JT; Perotti VJ
Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1577-89. PubMed ID: 10598471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem.
Dawson MR
Psychol Rev; 1991 Oct; 98(4):569-603. PubMed ID: 1961774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The spacing illusion: a spatial aperture problem?
Mather G; O'Halloran A; Anstis S
Perception; 1991; 20(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 1762881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ambiguous fluidity and rigidity and diamonds that ooze!
Meyer GE; Dougherty TJ
Perception; 1990; 19(4):491-6. PubMed ID: 2096367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human sensitivity to temporal proximity: the role of spatial and temporal speed gradients.
Freeman TC; Harris MG; Tyler PA
Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jun; 55(6):689-99. PubMed ID: 8058456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Illusory figures based on local kinematics.
Bruno N; Gerbino W
Perception; 1991; 20(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 1745596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Velocity constraints on apparent rotational movement.
Farrell JE; Larsen A; Bundesen C
Perception; 1982; 11(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 7186109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect.
Whitney D; Cavanagh P
Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1011-8. PubMed ID: 14674629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
