These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18348786)

  • 21. A boy or a girl? The ethics of preconception gender selection.
    Flug J
    J Halacha Contemporary Society; 2004; (48):5-27. PubMed ID: 15540377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptions towards sex selection among Jordanian population: A survey study.
    Banihani SA; Alzoubi KH; Shawaqfeh MS; Vasudevan S
    Andrologia; 2022 Oct; 54(9):e14501. PubMed ID: 35725245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The ethics of sex selection: a comparison of the attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians and physician providers of clinical sex selection services.
    Puri S; Nachtigall RD
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2107-14. PubMed ID: 19342036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gender selection: cultural and religious perspectives.
    Schenker JG
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2002 Sep; 19(9):400-10. PubMed ID: 12408533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Upsetting the balance on sex selection.
    Saunders B
    Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1022-1028. PubMed ID: 31309598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is preconception sex selection necessarily sexist?
    Purdy L
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 Dec; 15 Suppl 2():33-7. PubMed ID: 18088518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attitudes about preconception sex selection: a focus group study with Americans.
    Kalfoglou AL; Scott J; Hudson K
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Dec; 23(12):2731-6. PubMed ID: 18765401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S232-5. PubMed ID: 15363738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethics of sex selection for family balancing. Why balance families?
    Dawson K; Trounson A
    Hum Reprod; 1996 Dec; 11(12):2577-8. PubMed ID: 9021352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contraceptive use and attitudes in reunified Germany.
    Oddens BJ; Visser AP; Vemer HM; Everaerd WT
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1994 Dec; 57(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 7713296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Procreative liberty: the case for preconception sex selection.
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2003; 7(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 14656397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Opinions concerning pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and sex selection among gynecologist-obstetricians in Brazil.
    Caldas GH; Caldas E; Araújo ED; Bonetti TC; Leal CB; Costa AM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 19926204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Survey finds half of women approve of sex selection.
    Kouros N
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2013 Sep; 31(2):19-20. PubMed ID: 24844067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validity and reliability in reporting sexual partners and condom use in a Swiss population survey.
    Jeannin A; Konings E; Dubois-Arber F; Landert C; Van Melle G
    Eur J Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 14(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 9556172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding the opposition.
    Baldwin T
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 16856230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A 10-Year Interval Study About the Sexual Life and Attitudes of Korean Women: The Korean Internet Sexuality Survey (KISS) 2014, Part 2.
    Park J; Min B; Shin H; Oh S; Song WH; Cho SY; Cho MC; Jeong H; Son H
    J Sex Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):1142-1151. PubMed ID: 28859873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attitudes about Sex Selection and Sex Preference in Iranian Couples Referred for Sex Selection Technology.
    Ahmadi SF; Shirzad M; Kamali K; Ranjbar F; Behjati-Ardakani Z; Akhondi MM
    J Reprod Infertil; 2015; 16(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 25717434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of religious background on the attitude towards sex selection.
    Salame AA; Nassif J; Ghazeeri GS; Moubarak EM; Hannoun A; Abu Musa AA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2019 Jul; 3():100052. PubMed ID: 31404406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attitudes on the ethics of abortion, sex selection, and selective pregnancy termination among health care professionals, ethicists, and clergy likely to encounter such situations.
    Evans MI; Drugan A; Bottoms SF; Platt LD; Rodeck CA; Hansmann M; Fletcher JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Apr; 164(4):1092-9. PubMed ID: 2014831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sex selection: treating different cases differently.
    Dickens BM; Serour GI; Cook RJ; Qiu RZ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Aug; 90(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 15967448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.