These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

696 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18348839)

  • 1. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
    Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resident and attending physician attitudes regarding an audience response system.
    Kung JW; Slanetz PJ; Chen PH; Lee KS; Donohoe K; Eisenberg RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Nov; 9(11):828-31. PubMed ID: 23122351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of an audience response system during peer teaching among physical therapy students in human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.
    Wait KR; Cloud BA; Forster LA; Jones TM; Nokleby JJ; Wolfe CR; Youdas JW
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 19764082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
    Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologist/Educator knowledge of the audience response system and limitations to its use.
    Nicholson BT; Bassignani MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1555-60. PubMed ID: 19836271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A controlled study of improvements in student exam performance with the use of an audience response system during medical school lectures.
    Stoddard HA; Piquette CA
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S37-40. PubMed ID: 20881700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
    Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing a radiology-based teaching approach for gross anatomy in the digital era.
    Marker DR; Bansal AK; Juluru K; Magid D
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):1057-65. PubMed ID: 20447843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limitations of student evaluations of curriculum.
    Guest AR; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Fitzgerald JT; Bowerman RA
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Apr; 6(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 10894081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
    Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
    Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lecture versus standardized patient interaction in the surgical clerkship: a randomized prospective cross-over study.
    Carter MB; Wesley G; Larson GM
    Am J Surg; 2006 Feb; 191(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 16442957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an audience response system in a preclinical operative dentistry course.
    Elashvili A; Denehy GE; Dawson DV; Cunningham MA
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1296-303. PubMed ID: 18981208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Engaging students in active learning: use of a blog and audience response system.
    Abate LE; Gomes A; Linton A
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2011; 30(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21271448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introducing clinical laboratory science: CLS students help shape the future.
    Sawyer BG; Hubbard J; Rice-Spearman L
    Clin Lab Sci; 2006; 19(4):206-13. PubMed ID: 17181124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning.
    Latessa R; Mouw D
    Fam Med; 2005 Jan; 37(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 15619147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reinventing the apprenticeship: the hot seat in the digital era.
    Su TJ; Shaffer K
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Nov; 11(11):1300-7. PubMed ID: 15561580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Student accuracy and evaluation of a computer-based audience response system.
    Holmes RG; Blalock JS; Parker MH; Haywood VB
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Dec; 70(12):1355-61. PubMed ID: 17170327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients.
    Hulsman RL; Harmsen AB; Fabriek M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Feb; 74(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 19062232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy.
    Shaffer K; Small JE
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Sep; 11(9):1059-70. PubMed ID: 15350588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audience response systems: technology to engage learners.
    Collins J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 18755440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.