These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1834940)
1. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrocardiogram differentiation of benign early repolarization versus acute myocardial infarction by emergency physicians and cardiologists. Turnipseed SD; Bair AE; Kirk JD; Diercks DB; Tabar P; Amsterdam EA Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Sep; 13(9):961-6. PubMed ID: 16885399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Specificity of electrocardiographic myocardial infarction screening criteria in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Shah BR; Lin C; Maynard C; Bart B; Selvester RH; Shaw LK; O'Connor C; Wagner GS Am Heart J; 1998 Aug; 136(2):314-9. PubMed ID: 9704696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation. Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis. Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram. Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Fully automatic computer-analysis of electrocardiograms in clinical routine (author's transl)]. Mengden HJ; Just H; Kaspar W; Löllgen H; Kersting F Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct; 67(10):707-16. PubMed ID: 366940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Right ventricular infarction as an independent predictor of prognosis after acute inferior myocardial infarction. Zehender M; Kasper W; Kauder E; Schönthaler M; Geibel A; Olschewski M; Just H N Engl J Med; 1993 Apr; 328(14):981-8. PubMed ID: 8450875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation. Guglin ME; Thatai D Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 106(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 16321696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of ECG interpretation results obtained by computer and cardiologists. Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; Brohet CR; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G; Machado H; Michaelis J Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 2233377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?]. Morisbak B; Gjesdal K Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic interpretation of electrocardiograms in population-based research: computer program research physicians, or cardiologists? de Bruyne MC; Kors JA; Hoes AW; Kruijssen DA; Deckers JW; Grosfeld M; van Herpen G; Grobbee DE; van Bemmel JH J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Aug; 50(8):947-52. PubMed ID: 9291880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms. Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Where do derived precordial leads fail? Gregg RE; Zhou SH; Lindauer JM; Feild DQ; Helfenbein ED J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 18817921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of cardiologists' decisions to initiate reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with electrocardiograms viewed on liquid crystal displays of cellular telephones. Leibrandt PN; Bell SJ; Savona MR; Pettis KS; Selvester RH; Maynard C; Warner R; Wagner GS Am Heart J; 2000 Nov; 140(5):747-52. PubMed ID: 11054620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver agreement in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block. Sokolove PE; Sgarbossa EB; Amsterdam EA; Gelber R; Lee TC; Maynard C; Richards JR; Valente R; Wagner GS Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Dec; 36(6):566-71. PubMed ID: 11097696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value of the automated analysis of the electrocardiogram by the Telemed program (V version)]. Bernard P; Chaitman BR; Scholl JM; Chabot M Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Oct; 74(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 6796019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated electrocardiogram interpretation programs versus cardiologists' triage decision making based on teletransmitted data in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Clark EN; Sejersten M; Clemmensen P; Macfarlane PW Am J Cardiol; 2010 Dec; 106(12):1696-702. PubMed ID: 21126612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]