158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18349704)
1. Changes in the DP-gram during the preterm and early postnatal period.
Abdala C; Oba SI; Ramanathan R
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 18349704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.
Hunter LL; Blankenship CM; Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Brown DK; McCune A; Fitzpatrick DF; Lin L
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):863-873. PubMed ID: 29369290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in very preterm infants: A longitudinal study.
Seethapathy J; Boominathan P; Uppunda AK; Ninan B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jul; 146():110745. PubMed ID: 33940313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.
Wagner W; Plinkert PK; Vonthein R; Plontke SK
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
Sun XM; Shaver MD
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A longitudinal study of distortion product otoacoustic emission ipsilateral suppression and input/output characteristics in human neonates.
Abdala C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3239-50. PubMed ID: 14714805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
Abdala C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
Moulin A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in 3-month-old infants: evidence for postnatal maturation of human cochlear function?
Abdala C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3572-80. PubMed ID: 15658708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
Moulin A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Negative Middle Ear Pressure and Composite and Component Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
Thompson S; Henin S; Long GR
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 26049553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.
Uchida Y; Ando F; Shimokata H; Sugiura S; Ueda H; Nakashima T
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 18595184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-Term Variability of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants and Children and Its Relation to Pediatric Ototoxicity Monitoring.
Konrad-Martin D; Knight K; McMillan GP; Dreisbach LE; Nelson E; Dille M
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):239-253. PubMed ID: 29280917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in infants from birth to two months].
Pinto VS; Lewis DR
Pro Fono; 2007; 19(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 17710346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationships among standard and wideband measures of middle ear function and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Schairer KS; Morrison B; Szewczyk E; Fowler CG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):253-64. PubMed ID: 21756841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of gentamicin and levels of ambient sound on hearing screening outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit: A pilot study.
Garinis AC; Liao S; Cross CP; Galati J; Middaugh JL; Mace JC; Wood AM; McEvoy L; Moneta L; Lubianski T; Coopersmith N; Vigo N; Hart C; Riddle A; Ettinger O; Nold C; Durham H; MacArthur C; McEvoy C; Steyger PS
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():42-50. PubMed ID: 28483249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
