750 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18349779)
1. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study.
Tejwani NC; Murthy A; Park J; McLaurin TM; Egol KA; Kummer FJ
J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):795-9. PubMed ID: 19276755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.
Trease C; McIff T; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 16039369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volar versus dorsal locking plates with and without radial styloid locking plates for the fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: A biomechanical study in cadavers.
Blythe M; Stoffel K; Jarrett P; Kuster M
J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Dec; 31(10):1587-93. PubMed ID: 17145377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Functional results of the parallel-plate technique for complex distal humerus fractures].
Atalar AC; Demirhan M; Salduz A; Kiliçoğlu O; Seyahi A
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2009; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 19293612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model.
Filipowicz D; Lanz O; McLaughlin R; Elder S; Werre S
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19597629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical characteristics of locking and compression plate constructs applied dorsally to distal radius fractures.
Boswell S; McIff TE; Trease CA; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2007; 32(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 17481999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a volar locking plate provide equivalent stability as a dorsal nonlocking plate in a dorsally comminuted distal radius fracture?: a biomechanical study.
Kandemir U; Matityahu A; Desai R; Puttlitz C
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):605-10. PubMed ID: 18827589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens.
Lill H; Hepp P; Korner J; Kassi JP; Verheyden AP; Josten C; Duda GN
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Apr; 123(2-3):74-81. PubMed ID: 12721684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distal humerus internal fixation: a biomechanical comparison of 90° and parallel constructs.
Kollias CM; Darcy SP; Reed JG; Rosvold JM; Shrive NG; Hildebrand KA
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Sep; 39(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 21290022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of parallel versus 90-90 plating of bicolumn distal humerus fractures with intra-articular comminution.
Got C; Shuck J; Biercevicz A; Paller D; Mulcahey M; Zimmermann M; Blaine T; Green A
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 37(12):2512-8. PubMed ID: 23174063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are conventional reconstruction plates equivalent to precontoured locking plates for distal humerus fracture fixation? A biomechanics cadaver study.
Koonce RC; Baldini TH; Morgan SJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):697-701. PubMed ID: 22538250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.
Siffri PC; Peindl RD; Coley ER; Norton J; Connor PM; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):547-54. PubMed ID: 16990726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
Floyd JC; O'Toole RV; Stall A; Forward DP; Nabili M; Shillingburg D; Hsieh A; Nascone JW
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):628-33. PubMed ID: 19897983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Functional results after osteosynthesis of the distal humerus fracture with an anatomically precontoured, angular-stable double plate system].
Schmidt-Horlohé K; Bonk A; Wilde P; Becker L; Hoffmann R
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 May; 148(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 20135617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
