These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18350413)

  • 1. Enhancement of face recognition learning in patients with brain injury using three cognitive training procedures.
    Powell J; Letson S; Davidoff J; Valentine T; Greenwood R
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 18(2):182-203. PubMed ID: 18350413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage.
    Caldara R; Schyns P; Mayer E; Smith ML; Gosselin F; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1652-66. PubMed ID: 16269103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acquired prosopagnosia as a face-specific disorder: ruling out the general visual similarity account.
    Busigny T; Graf M; Mayer E; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2051-67. PubMed ID: 20362595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probing the face-space of individuals with prosopagnosia.
    Nishimura M; Doyle J; Humphreys K; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1828-41. PubMed ID: 20227431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence and correlates of face recognition impairments after acquired brain injury.
    Valentine T; Powell J; Davidoff J; Letson S; Greenwood R
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 16(3):272-97. PubMed ID: 16835152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The faces you remember: caricaturing shape facilitates brain processes reflecting the acquisition of new face representations.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 21925235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual learning in face processing: comparison facilitates face recognition.
    Dwyer DM; Vladeanu M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2055-67. PubMed ID: 19235097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the loss of diagnosticity of the eye region of the face a common aspect of acquired prosopagnosia?
    Rossion B; Kaiser MD; Bub D; Tanaka JW
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):69-78. PubMed ID: 19338717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures.
    Hussain Z; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2273-84. PubMed ID: 19555706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Specialized face perception mechanisms extract both part and spacing information: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia.
    Yovel G; Duchaine B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):580-93. PubMed ID: 16768361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional plasticity in ventral temporal cortex following cognitive rehabilitation of a congenital prosopagnosic.
    DeGutis JM; Bentin S; Robertson LC; D'Esposito M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 19(11):1790-802. PubMed ID: 17958482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High and low performers differ in the use of shape information for face recognition.
    Kaufmann JM; Schulz C; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1310-9. PubMed ID: 23562837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impaired holistic processing of unfamiliar individual faces in acquired prosopagnosia.
    Ramon M; Busigny T; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):933-44. PubMed ID: 19944710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impaired spatial coding within objects but not between objects in prosopagnosia.
    Barton JJ; Cherkasova MV
    Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 16043798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantic learning modifies perceptual face processing.
    Heisz JJ; Shedden JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 18752406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.
    Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2027-40. PubMed ID: 20362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-latency ERPs and recognition of facial identity.
    Olivares EI; Iglesias J; Rodríguez-Holguín S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):136-51. PubMed ID: 12590848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.