These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1835159)

  • 1. Relationship between performance on lumbar dynamometry and Waddell score in a population with low-back pain.
    Hirsch G; Beach G; Cooke C; Menard M; Locke S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1991 Sep; 16(9):1039-43. PubMed ID: 1835159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship of performance on the ERGOS work simulator to illness behavior in a workers' compensation population with low back versus limb injury.
    Cooke C; Dusik LA; Menard MR; Fairburn SM; Beach GN
    J Occup Med; 1994 Jul; 36(7):757-62. PubMed ID: 7931742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pattern of performance in workers with low back pain during a comprehensive motor performance evaluation.
    Menard MR; Cooke C; Locke SR; Beach GN; Butler TB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jun; 19(12):1359-66. PubMed ID: 8066516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serial lumbar dynamometry in low back pain.
    Cooke C; Menard MR; Beach GN; Locke SR; Hirsch GH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 Jun; 17(6):653-62. PubMed ID: 1385659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A structured evidence-based review on the meaning of nonorganic physical signs: Waddell signs.
    Fishbain DA; Cole B; Cutler RB; Lewis J; Rosomoff HL; Rosomoff RS
    Pain Med; 2003 Jun; 4(2):141-81. PubMed ID: 12911018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships between isoinertial lumbar dynamometry parameters and demographic parameters in chronic low back pain patients.
    Hutten MM; Hermens HJ
    Eur Spine J; 1998; 7(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 9883954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normative database for trunk range of motion, strength, velocity, and endurance with the Isostation B-200 Lumbar Dynamometer.
    Gomez T; Beach G; Cooke C; Hrudey W; Goyert P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1991 Jan; 16(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 1825892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in treatment outcome between subgroups of patients with chronic low back pain using lumbar dynamometry and psychological aspects.
    Hutten MM; Hermens HJ; Zilvold G
    Clin Rehabil; 2001 Oct; 15(5):479-88. PubMed ID: 11594638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Illness behavior as a predictor of pain and overt behavior patterns in chronic low back pain patients.
    Keefe FJ; Crisson JE; Maltbie A; Bradley L; Gil KM
    J Psychosom Res; 1986; 30(5):543-51. PubMed ID: 2945923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between nonorganic signs and centralization of symptoms in the prediction of return to work for patients with low back pain.
    Karas R; McIntosh G; Hall H; Wilson L; Melles T
    Phys Ther; 1997 Apr; 77(4):354-60; discussion 361-9. PubMed ID: 9105339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of preoperative depression and somatic perception scales with postoperative disability and quality of life after lumbar discectomy.
    Chaichana KL; Mukherjee D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Feb; 14(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 21214315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship of physical examination findings and self-reported symptom severity and physical function in patients with degenerative lumbar conditions.
    Lyle MA; Manes S; McGuinness M; Ziaei S; Iversen MD
    Phys Ther; 2005 Feb; 85(2):120-33. PubMed ID: 15679463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of nonorganic sign-testing and the Waddell score in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Apeldoorn AT; Bosselaar H; Blom-Luberti T; Twisk JW; Lankhorst GJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):821-6. PubMed ID: 18379412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The predictive value of pain drawings in lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
    Andersen T; Christensen FB; Høy KW; Helmig P; Niedermann B; Hansen ES; Bünger C
    Spine J; 2010 May; 10(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 20421073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar motion trends and correlation with low back pain. Part II. A roentgenological evaluation of quantitative segmental motion in lateral bending.
    Haas M; Nyiendo J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 May; 15(4):224-34. PubMed ID: 1386100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cross-sectional construct validity of the Waddell score.
    Apeldoorn AT; Ostelo RW; Fritz JM; van der Ploeg T; van Tulder MW; de Vet HC
    Clin J Pain; 2012 May; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 21926909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of lumbar dynamometry measurements in patients with chronic low back pain with test-retest measurements on different days.
    Hutten MM; Hermens HJ
    Eur Spine J; 1997; 6(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 9093828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A scale for predicting nonphysiological contributions to pain.
    Dirks HF; Wunder J; Reynolds J; Basse R; Kinsman R; Jones N
    Psychother Psychosom; 1996; 65(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 8784947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain.
    Waddell G; McCulloch JA; Kummel E; Venner RM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1980; 5(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 6446157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.