These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18352872)

  • 21. Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation.
    Rose LT; Moshegov CN
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 12648044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The importance of biometry to cataract outcomes in a surgical unit in Africa.
    Briesen S; Roberts H; Lewallen S
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 17(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 20642341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation.
    Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Sakla HF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 17720072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Refractive error after cataract surgery combined with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    de Sanctis U; Damiani F; Brusasco L; Grignolo F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 156(2):254-259.e1. PubMed ID: 23870359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry in terms of target postoperative refraction].
    Hrebcová J; Skorkovská S; Vasků A
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jul; 65(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 19750832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery: Scheimpflug keratometry versus standard automated keratometry in virgin corneas.
    Lam S; Gupta BK; Hahn JM; Manastersky NA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1984-7. PubMed ID: 21889873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula.
    Fenzl RE; Gills JP; Cherchio M
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Sep; 105(9):1759-64. PubMed ID: 9754188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The correlation of corneal refractive power, axial length, and the refractive power of the emmetropizing intraocular lens in cataractous eyes.
    Sayegh FN
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1996 Nov; 5(6):328-31. PubMed ID: 9479513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Effect of Cyclopentolate on Ocular Biometric Components.
    Hashemi H; Asharlous A; Khabazkhoob M; Iribarren R; Khosravi A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jun; 97(6):440-447. PubMed ID: 32511166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The AS biometry technique--a novel technique to aid accurate intraocular lens power calculation after corneal laser refractive surgery.
    Sambare C; Naroo S; Shah S; Sharma A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 May; 29(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 16600667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes of higher-order aberrations with the use of various mydriatics.
    Kim JH; Lim T; Kim MJ; Tchah H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):602-5. PubMed ID: 19663926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using partial coherence interferometry in patients with high myopia.
    Roessler GF; Dietlein TS; Plange N; Roepke AK; Dinslage S; Walter P; Mazinani BA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 22512374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of postoperative refractive error correction after cataract surgery.
    Antwi-Adjei EK; Owusu E; Kobia-Acquah E; Dadzie EE; Anarfi E; Wanye S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252787. PubMed ID: 34138900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pupillary dilation and axial length measurement for preoperative assessment of intraocular lens power.
    Sadiq SA; McElvanney AM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 1996; 6(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 8823587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Confirmation and refinement of the Diehl-Miller nomogram for intraocular lens power calculation after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Date RC; Yu F; Miller KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 May; 39(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 23489917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors affecting the predictability of SRK II in patients with normal axial length undergoing phacoemulsification surgery.
    Lim LH; Lee SY; Ang CL
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Feb; 50(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 19296025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intraocular lens power in bilateral cataract surgery: whether adjusting for error of predicted refraction in the first eye improves prediction in the second eye.
    Jabbour J; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Hennessy MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2091-7. PubMed ID: 17137989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post-Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator.
    Wang L; Hill WE; Koch DD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1466-73. PubMed ID: 20692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gender differences in biometry prediction error and intra-ocular lens power calculation formula.
    Behndig A; Montan P; Lundström M; Zetterström C; Kugelberg M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):759-63. PubMed ID: 24930806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.