These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18352920)

  • 1. Effect of different splint removal techniques on the surface roughness of human enamel: a three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis.
    Cehreli ZC; Lakshmipathy M; Yazici R
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 18352920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
    Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods.
    Eliades T; Gioka C; Eliades G; Makou M
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 15222720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
    Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Voit S; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12540119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro investigation of the effectiveness of bioactive glass air-abrasion in the 'selective' removal of orthodontic resin adhesive.
    Banerjee A; Paolinelis G; Socker M; McDonald F; Watson TF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Oct; 116(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 18821993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding.
    Hong YH; Lew KK
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 7781720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment.
    Ozer T; Başaran G; Kama JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 20197174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
    Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
    Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins.
    Joniot SB; Grégoire GL; Auther AM; Roques YM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 11203836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 9484147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various post-stripping polishing methods: an in vitro study.
    Gupta P; Gupta N; Patel N; Gupta R; Sandhu GS; Naik C
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 23304974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enamel surface evaluation after removal of orthodontic composite remnants by intraoral sandblasting: a 3-dimensional surface profilometry study.
    Kim SS; Park WK; Son WS; Ahn HS; Ro JH; Kim YD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 17628253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping.
    Piacentini C; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 8540483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.